Case Overview
The Dark and Lovely lawsuit involves claims brought by individuals who developed uterine, ovarian and other reproductive cancers after using chemical hair relaxers for years. These women allege that L’Oréal and its subsidiary SoftSheen-Carson, manufacturers of Dark and Lovely, failed to warn consumers about the risks associated with endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) used in their products.
Key takeaways about the Dark and Lovely lawsuit
- Dark and Lovely is one of several L’Oréal relaxer brands named in federal multidistrict litigation (MDL).
- Plaintiffs allege long-term use exposed them to parabens and phthalates and led to an increased cancer risk.
- No settlement has been announced as of January 2026. The MDL remains in the discovery phase with bellwether trials expected in 2026.
What is Dark and Lovely?
Introduced in 1972, Dark and Lovely is a popular line of chemical hair relaxers, creams, and dyes marketed primarily to Black and Brown women. These women have been using hair relaxers for generations. Historically, textured hair has been stigmatized as inconsistent with Euro-centric standards of beauty. Texturism — the idea that “good hair” is straighter hair — has deep-seated roots in American history. For decades, the brand, owned by SoftSheen-Carson under L’Oréal USA, promoted itself as a safe and effective way to straighten natural hair.
However, recent research suggests these products may expose users to EDCs that interfere with hormone regulation. Studies have identified ingredients like phthalates, parabens and formaldehyde-releasing preservatives. All of these may alter estrogen and progesterone activity.
Alleged health risks linked to Dark and Lovely
Hair relaxer lawsuits allege that long-term use of Dark and Lovely and similar products caused serious reproductive harm through chronic exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Reported injuries include:
- Uterine cancer
- Ovarian and endometrial cancers
- Uterine fibroids and hysterectomies
Research shows that EDCs found in relaxers, such as phthalates and parabens, can mimic or block the body’s own hormones, increasing cancer risk and disrupting reproductive health. The National Institutes of Health’s Sister Study, in particular, found that women who regularly used chemical straighteners had twice the likelihood of developing uterine cancer than women who did not use straighteners.
Dark and Lovely lawsuit updates and MDL status
Plaintiffs in the Dark and Lovely lawsuits argue that manufacturers knew or should have known of these side effects but continued to market the products as safe. The Hair Relaxer MDL (No. 3060) was established in February 2023 to coordinate pretrial proceedings for thousands of similar lawsuits nationwide. The litigation is overseen by Judge Mary M. Rowland in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
As of January 2026, the MDL includes more than 10,900 pending cases. These include cases against brands such as Dark and Lovely, Just for Me and Olive Oil relaxers.
The lawsuits claim manufacturers misled consumers by failing to disclose the risks of long-term chemical exposure. Discovery and expert review are ongoing, and bellwether trials are expected to help shape future hair relaxer lawsuit settlement discussions.
Filing a Dark and Lovely lawsuit
Women who developed ovarian, uterine or endometrial cancer after years of using Dark and Lovely or similar chemical relaxers may qualify to file a claim. To pursue compensation, plaintiffs must typically show consistent product use and a related medical diagnosis. Attorneys can help gather documentation (including medical records, purchase evidence and testimony) to build a strong case.
Those who qualify may seek compensation for:
- Medical expenses for diagnosis and treatment
- Lost wages or reduced earning capacity
- Pain, suffering, and emotional distress
- Punitive damages in cases of egregious misconduct
Most claims are part of the Chemical Hair Relaxer MDL (No. 3060), which centralizes pretrial proceedings while keeping each case independent. Filing deadlines vary by state, so consulting a toxic exposure lawyer early is crucial to preserving your rights and determining the best course of action.
Frequently asked questions
Is there a Dark and Lovely class action lawsuit?
No. There is no Dark and Lovely class action lawsuit. Instead, individual lawsuits have been consolidated into a federal MDL in the District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The MDL streamlines pretrial proceedings while allowing each plaintiff to maintain their individual claim.
Has there been a Dark and Lovely lawsuit settlement?
No. As of 2025, the MDL is in the discovery phase and no global settlement has been announced. Future settlements may depend on the results of upcoming bellwether trials and expert findings.
What types of cancers are linked to Dark and Lovely hair relaxers?
Studies have suggested uterine, ovarian and endometrial cancers are linked to hair relaxers, such as Dark and Lovely and other chemical relaxers. Uterine fibroids and other reproductive conditions may also develop as a result of hair relaxer use.
Who is being sued in the Dark and Lovely lawsuit?
Amongst many other companies and brands, defendants include L’Oréal USA and SoftSheen-Carson, the companies that manufacture and market Dark and Lovely products.
What should I do if I used Dark and Lovely and developed cancer?
If you were diagnosed with cancer after long-term Dark and Lovely use, you may qualify to file a hair relaxer lawsuit. Speaking with a toxic exposure attorney can help determine eligibility and file your case correctly.
Our toxic exposure experience
Motley Rice leads litigation brought by thousands of women harmed by defective products. Our law firm has extensive experience litigating product liability lawsuits for women who:
- Developed ovarian cancer after using talc-based baby powder for feminine hygiene
- Suffered breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) allegedly caused by Allergan implants
- Endured severe complications allegedly caused by birth control devices such as Essure® and Paragard®
- Suffered complications arising from the use of transvaginal mesh
Many people have been impacted by ovarian cancer, uterine cancer or endometrial cancer allegedly caused by using chemical hair relaxers. If you believe you have been similarly harmed, consider discussing your options with an attorney with experience in multidistrict litigation (MDL) and class actions.
Key takeaways
What is Dark and Lovely?
Alleged health risks linked to Dark and Lovely
Dark and Lovely lawsuit updates and MDL status
Filing a Dark and Lovely lawsuit
Frequently asked questions
Our toxic exposure experience
- Sources
- ABA. MDL vs. Class Action: Place, Plaintiffs, and Procedure.
- Chang CJ, et al. Use of Straighteners and Other Hair Products and Incident Uterine Cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Oct., 17, 2022.
- DTSC. Chemicals in Hair Straightening Products.
- Environmental Research: Measurement of endocrine disrupting and asthma-associated chemicals in hair products used by Black women
- Harley KG, et al. Reducing phthalate, paraben, and phenol exposure from personal care products in adolescent girls: findings from the HERMOSA Intervention Study. Environ Health Perspect 2016;124:1600–1607.
- Helm J.S., et al. Measurement of endocrine disrupting and asthma-associated chemicals in hair products used by Black women. Environ. Research 2018;165:448-458.
- Koski O, Hu S. Fighting Phthalates. National Resources Defense Council, April 20, 2022.
- Mallozzi M, et al. Endocrine disrupting chemicals and endometrial cancer: an overview of recent laboratory evidence and epidemiological studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 22;14(3):334.
- Mamavation. Hair Relaxer Products: When Racism & Toxins Collide.
- Master Complaint, Hair Relaxer MDL 3060
- Mayo Clinic. Metabolic syndrome.
- Medical News Today. How does bisphenol A affect health?
- National Institutes of Health: Hair straightening chemicals associated with higher uterine cancer risk.
- Odele. 6 Things Everyone Should Know About Black Hair History.
- Peterson, Jaclyn. The Price of Beauty. CTI Charlotte Teachers Institute Curriculum (2021).
- Pierce J.S., et al. Characterization of Formaldehyde Exposure Resulting from the Use of Four Professional Hair Straightening Products. J. Occ. and Environ. Hygiene 2011;8:686-699.
- Randle, B. I Am Not My Hair, Race, Gender and Class. Volume 22, Number 1-2, 114 121 (2015).
- Richard, C. This History of Hair Relaxers.
- Sarink D, et al. BPA, parabens, and phthalates in relation to endometrial cancer risk: a case-control study nested in the multiethnic cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 2021;129(5):57702.
- United States Environmental Protection Agency. Endocrine Disruption.
- U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fourth national report on human exposure to environmental chemicals: updated tables, Volume 1.
- Wang Y, Qian H. Phthalates and Their Impacts on Human Health, Healthcare. 2021 May; 9(5): 603.
- White, AJ, Sandler DP, Gaston SA, Jackson CL, O'Brien KM. Use of Hair Products in Relation to Ovarian Cancer Risk. Carcinogenesis. Vol. 42, No. 9, 1189-1195, 1189 (2021).
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Prohibited & Restricted Ingredients in Cosmetics.
- US Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Pending MDL Dockets by District.
- Zota A.R., et al. The Environmental Injustice of Beauty: Framing Chemical Exposures from Beauty Products as a Health Disparities Concern. Am. J. Obstet. & Gyn. Oct. 2017.
Start Your Motley Rice Consultation in Simple Steps
Submit Information
Call us or fill out our online form with the details of your potential case.
Case Review
Our team reviews your information to assess your potential case.
Case Consultation
Talk with us about next steps.
