Active case

Toxic Exposure /

Chemical Hair Straightener Lawsuit

Chemical Hair Straightener Lawsuit

Chemical hair straightener lawsuits are ongoing as of November 2024 and are now part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL).

Connect with an attorney

Case Overview

Thousands of chemical hair straightener lawsuits have been filed and are still pending. The plaintiffs allege that they developed uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, or ovarian cancer after using hair straighteners with potentially dangerous ingredients that the manufacturers failed to properly warn about.

Key takeaways about the hair straightener lawsuit

  • Hair straightening products may be linked to reproductive cancers including ovarian, uterine, or endometrial cancer. 
  • A multidistrict litigation (MDL) is currently underway for hair straightener cases. 
  • Those who are eligible to file a lawsuit can still join as of November 2024.

Why are people filing hair straightener lawsuits?

Women are filing lawsuits because they developed a form of reproductive cancer after using hair straightener or hair relaxer products. The plaintiffs in the hair straightener lawsuit claim the defendants:

  1. Were aware of the risks of hair straightening chemicals and used them in their products anyway
  2. Marketed the products without warning consumers of the dangers 
  3. Misrepresented the products as “safe” and “natural”
  4. Used discriminatory language and promoted the virtues of straight hair

These lawsuits started after research showed that the chemicals in these products could be dangerous. Dangerous ingredients like phthalates, parabens, cyclosiloxanes, di-(2-ethylhexyl), octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane, lye, formaldehyde, and other toxic chemicals were found in some hair straightening products. These chemical ingredients may disrupt the endocrine system ultimately leading to cancer. Consumers were never warned about the dangers or potential risks associated with these products.

Recent research suggests that the chemicals in hair straightening products could cause ovarian, uterine and endometrial cancers. Some of these potentially dangerous hair straightener products are meant to straighten or “relax” women’s hair. Others were for keratin treatments to strengthen the hair or perms to curl it.

The hair straightener lawsuits are part of a fast-growing multidistrict litigation with more than 8,390 pending actions as of November 2024. The suits allege that women developed ovarian, uterine and endometrial cancers as a result of the defendant companies’ failure to warn consumers about the dangerous chemicals in their products.

Motley Rice lawyers are in the process of reviewing potential cases that involve these three types of reproductive cancers.

Terms to know about hair straighteners

  • Carcinogen: A substance, organism or agent that causes cancer.
  • Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs): Chemicals that interfere with the body’s endocrine system (hormones). 
  • Endocrine disruption: Developmental malformations, reproductive interference, cancer, immune system function changes or nervous system function changes that happen as a result of endocrine-disrupting chemicals. 
  • Endocrine system: The pituitary gland, thyroid, pancreas and other tissues that create and release hormones. 
  • Formaldehyde: A chemical used in building materials, disinfectants, medical preservatives and some personal or beauty products like hair straighteners. It’s also found naturally in the environment around decaying plant material.
  • Hair straightener: A chemical product that permanently breaks down the proteins in a person’s hair to make it appear straighter.
  • Hair relaxer: A chemical product that loosens curls by altering disulfide bonds so the curls are not as tight. 
  • Keratin treatment: A chemical treatment that uses keratin to coat the hair so that it appears sleeker. 
  • Perm: A chemical treatment used to create curls in straight hair. 
  • Reproductive cancers: Cancers that develop in the reproductive system of the body (cervical, ovarian, uterine, vaginal and vulvar cancer). 

Is there a hair straightener class action lawsuit?

Motley Rice is not currently litigating any hair straightener class action lawsuits. But class actions have been filed in which the class representatives are asking for the money they spent on defective hair straightening products to be refunded to them. 

In a class action lawsuit, plaintiffs file a lawsuit on behalf of a larger group who experienced the same harm, in the same way by the same defendant(s). In an MDL, several or many plaintiffs file lawsuits that are later consolidated or grouped together under one court and one judge for pre-trial matters, but the details of individual plaintiff’s cases are maintained. If the cases go to trial, they are tried as individual matters, unlike a class action.

Motley Rice attorneys are involved and hold leadership roles in the Federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) in which plaintiffs allege harm from hair straightening products from companies like L‘Oréal, Strength of Nature and others. 

If you’re a woman who has developed uterine cancer, endometrial cancer or ovarian cancer after using chemical hair straighteners, reach out to a Motley Rice attorney to learn about your legal options.

Scientific evidence linking hair straighteners to cancer

Uterine, ovarian and endometrial cancers may be strongly linked to chemical hair straighteners. Researchers have documented chemicals in the products that include parabens and phthalates, which are believed to disrupt the endocrine system. One other common ingredient is formaldehyde which is a known cancer-causing chemical. 

One analysis of 1,177 beauty and personal care products found that one in twelve of the products were designated as highly hazardous on EWG’s Skin Deep Cosmetics Database. These products were largely marketed to black and brown women.

The chemicals used in hair straighteners may be endocrine-disrupting. Endocrine disruption interferes with the body’s ability to regulate its hormones. If a woman’s hormones are out of balance, she may have an increased risk for a variety of health issues like cancer, reproductive impairment, obesity and cognitive deficits.

One study found that using hair straighteners four times in a year was related to an increased risk of ovarian cancer. Another group of researchers found that uterine cancers were more common in women who had used hair straighteners in the last 12 months. Women have also reported developing endometrial cancers after using hair straightening products.

Black women now have higher rates of aggressive uterine cancers and are twice as likely to die from their diagnosis. In one study, nearly 45,000 women with no history of cancer were interviewed about their use of hair straighteners and were monitored for 22 years. At the end of the study, the researchers noted that the number of postmenopausal women who used hair straighteners and later developed uterine cancer was significant. Postmenopausal women who had never used hair straighteners were less likely to develop uterine cancer. 

Are there safe hair straighteners?

There are non-chemical hair straighteners that may be safe to use. However, chemical hair straighteners are potentially dangerous and unsafe. Based on current research, these products may cause cancer due to harmful ingredients. There are ways to straighten hair without dangerous or potentially cancerous chemicals, though.

Non-chemical hair straighteners:

  • Hot combs: A metal fine tooth comb that is heated and combed through the hair to straighten it. 
  • Silk Press: A professional hair care service that uses a flat iron to straighten the hair.

When looking for safe hair straightening products, you may also choose to avoid potentially dangerous chemical ingredients like: 

  • Cyclosiloxanes
  • Di-(2-ethylhexyl)
  • Lye 
  • Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane
  • Parabens
  • Phthalates

You should also avoid known carcinogens such as formaldehyde. 

It’s also important to note that some chemicals may not be explicitly listed on an ingredients label and instead could be listed as “fragrance” or “perfumes.”

Cancers that are linked to chemical hair straighteners

Chemical hair straighteners may be closely linked to uterine, endometrial and ovarian cancers. Recent studies suggest that uterine cancer may be the most strongly linked between the three types of cancer when hair straighteners were used frequently.

Uterine cancer

Uterine cancers happen when cells multiply too rapidly in the top part of the uterus. Uterine cancers include endometrial cancer and uterine sarcoma. Treatment for uterine cancer may involve chemotherapy, radiation or even surgery such as a hysterectomy to remove the uterus.

Uterine cancer is the most common reproductive cancer affecting women in the United States. Roughly 65,000 people receive a uterine cancer diagnosis every year. It’s important to know the potential signs of uterine cancer so you can seek medical care early.

Potential signs of uterine cancer

There are several potential signs of uterine cancer. If you notice any of these symptoms, be sure to ask your doctor about them. The symptoms of uterine cancer typically have to do with vaginal bleeding in between periods or after menopause. 

Signs of uterine cancer:

  • Any spotting or vaginal bleeding after menopause, even small amounts
  • Bleeding in between periods before menopause 
  • Cramping in the pelvis or lower abdominal pain 
  • Intense or drawn-out periods of vaginal bleeding after age 40
  • Vaginal discharge that is clear or thin and white  post menopause

If you experience any of these signs of uterine cancer, you should reach out to your doctor. 

Ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer begins when the DNA of cells in or near the ovaries change or mutate. The cells then multiply until they create a tumor. 

Symptoms range from fatigue to pelvic or back pain. It’s also possible that no symptoms will be detected. For that reason, it may be easy for ovarian cancer symptoms to be written off or misdiagnosed. That’s why it’s important to know the signs of ovarian cancer so you can seek medical care early.

Treatment for ovarian cancer typically involves chemotherapy or surgery.

Potential signs of ovarian cancer

There are potential signs for ovarian cancer that you should be aware of. If you notice any of these symptoms, it’s important to take your concerns to your doctor as soon as possible. 

Signs of ovarian cancer:

  • Back pain
  • Bloating or swelling in the abdomen
  • Bowel movement changes like constipation
  • Fatigue
  • Feeling full quickly while eating
  • Pelvic area discomfort 
  • Unexpected weight loss
  • Urinate frequently

If you experience any of these signs of ovarian cancer, you should speak to a doctor.

Endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer develops as cells overproduce in the uterine lining and is a form of uterine cancer. It is often detected early due to its symptoms. Irregular vaginal bleeding may be one of the first symptoms. It’s important to know the signs so that you can get a diagnosis early. 

Potential signs of endometrial cancer

There are several signs of endometrial cancer to look for if you think something may be off with your health. If you’re dealing with these symptoms, it’s important to reach out to your health care provider as soon as possible. 

Signs of endometrial cancer:

  • Bleeding between periods
  • Bleeding after menopause
  • Pelvic area pain

If you notice signs of endometrial cancer, you should reach out to your doctor. 

Contact a hair straightener attorney

If you or a loved one was diagnosed with uterine, ovarian or endometrial cancer after using a chemical hair straightener product, you may have legal options. To discuss a potential case or learn more, contact hair straightener MDL co-lead Fidelma Fitzpatrick

Call at 1-800-768-4026 or email at any time.

Brands named in chemical hair straightener lawsuits

Companies named in the hair straightener lawsuit allegedly manufactured, marketed and sold dangerous chemical straighteners to consumers. Some of the companies named are individual brands while others are parent companies to many brands. 

Companies named in the chemical hair straightener lawsuit currently include: 

  • Avlon
  • Dabur
  • Godrej SON Holdings
  • House of Cheatham
  • JF Labs
  • L’Oréal
  • Luster
  • McBride
  • Namaste Laboratories
  • PDC Brands
  • Revlon Inc.
  • Sally Beauty
  • SoftSheen-Carson
  • Strength of Nature

The companies listed above allegedly made and sold hair products with cancer-causing chemicals in them under various brand names. These brands are responsible for potentially dangerous products like:

  • Affirm®
  • African Pride®
  • Africa’s Best®
  • Cantu
  • Crème of Nature®
  • Dark & Lovely®
  • Design Essentials®
  • Dr. Miracle’s®
  • Dream Kids
  • Hawaiian Silky®
  • Just for Me®
  • Mizani®
  • Motions®
  • Optimum Care®
  • Organic Root Stimulator™
  • ORS Olive Oil™
  • Pink Conditioning No-Lye Relaxer®
  • Profectiv Mega Growth®
  • Revlon Realistic®
  • Roots of Nature®
  • Silk Elements®
  • Smooth Touch No-Lye Relaxer®
  • Soft & Beautiful®
  • TCB®
  • TCB Naturals®

Potentially harmful marketing efforts

The plaintiffs in the hair straightener litigation allege that companies knowingly marketed dangerous products and did so disproportionately to women of color. These products were marketed in ways that promoted discrimination against people of African descent. 

Women with black and brown hair textures may be discriminated against due to how their hair looks. Straight, untextured hair is often (mistakenly) considered to be more hygienic or standard in professional and social settings. This standard promotes eurocentrism and may disenfranchise people of color. Hair straightening companies have allegedly capitalized on this form of discrimination and in the process caused harm to many women of color in the process.

Companies named in the lawsuit market their products as “organic” and “safe” despite the presence of harmful chemicals. Perhaps because the products are marketed as safe, families may use the same brand of chemical hair straighteners for generations.

Who is eligible to file a hair straightening products lawsuit?

Each person’s case may be different, but in general, you may have a claim for a hair straightening products lawsuit if you or a loved one: 

  • Used chemical hair straighteners in the past
  • Used hair straighteners frequently (multiple times a year)
  • Developed ovarian cancer, uterine cancer or endometrial cancer after using chemical hair straighteners. 

If you think you may be eligible, reach out to a Motley Rice attorney today. 

What should I do if I use hair relaxers and have been diagnosed with cancer?

If you have been diagnosed with cancer, please work with your doctor to establish your treatment plan first and foremost. We know that life after a cancer diagnosis can be frightening and stressful, but please know you’re not alone. 

If you were diagnosed with uterine, endometrial or ovarian cancer and have used chemical hair straighteners in the past, you may be eligible to file a lawsuit against the cosmetic companies that made the products. 

Hair straightener lawsuit updates and timeline

11.01.24

November 2024

As of November 2024, more than 8,390 lawsuits have been initiated against manufacturers of hair straightening products.

07.01.24

July 2024

Pending actions reached 8,192. The proposed ban on formaldehyde was delayed by the FDA again.

06.01.24

June 2024

As of June 3, 2024, 8,170 actions were pending in the hair straightener MDL. That’s 244 actions added since January 2024. Pending actions are the individual actions or cases filed within an MDL. 

04.01.24

April 2024

The FDA had an April 2024 deadline to implement a formaldehyde ban on hair straightening products but missed the deadline.

02.01.24

February 2024

Judge Grimm was appointed to help manage the complex proceedings as Special Master on Electronically Stored Information (ESI) discovery disputes for MDL No. 3060. 

11.01.23

November 2023

Three subsidiaries of Dabur India were originally included in the MDL, but in November 2023, two were dismissed due to personal jurisdiction not being in the United States. Namaste Laboratories remains a defendant. 

A claim to include Revlon in the MDL was filed. These claims were not originally included because their parent company filed bankruptcy. The claim in November 2023 would potentially require Revlon to compensate plaintiffs in their bankruptcy plan. 

10.01.23

October 2023

The FDA proposed a ban that acknowledged a link between formaldehyde and cancer, and called out formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasing chemicals in hair relaxers as potentially cancer causing.

08.01.23

August 2023

Approval provided for the hair relaxer MDL in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division. A Short Form Complaint, which is like the original complaint in a shortened format, is filed by an individual plaintiff and includes essential information of the MDL like specific claims, allegations, injury, and damages. Broad allegations common to all plaintiffs in the MDL are also referenced in the Short Form Complaint. A Short Form Complaint allows us to address the unique aspects of each plaintiff’s case while also remaining consistent with the main issues of the MDL.

05.01.23

May 2023

A new docket entry was made to explain the process for filing new cases. Future complaints would be filed as a new case in the Northern District of Illinois and would receive its own docket number. A district’s civil cover sheet connecting the new case with the MDL was required. The Court’s Clerk’s Office would transfer the new case to the MDL.

The formal Master Complaint was submitted in federal court. The individual complaints and common allegations were consolidated into the Master Complaint. 

03.01.23

March 2023

Fidelma Fitzpatrick became co-lead counsel for the hair relaxer MDL. Because the MDL had several law firms representing various plaintiffs, a Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee (PSC) was nominated. The PSC would be responsible for communicating with the court on behalf of all plaintiffs. Fitzpatrick and their co-leads would preside over the actions of the PSC.

02.01.23

February 2023

The MDL for hair straightener marketing, products liability and sales practices litigation was approved and assigned to the Northern District of Illinois. U.S. District Judge Mary M. Rowland was assigned to the hair straightener MDL.

01.01.23

January 2023

A hearing to determine if the lawsuits will consolidate was held. The defendants were against the consolidation but plaintiffs were hopeful the hearing would be favorable. The Panel made no formal decision at that time.

12.01.22

December 2022

A hearing date was set for January 2023 by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to consolidate the lawsuits into an MDL. The defendants would have the opportunity to voice their objections to the MDL in the hearing.

L’Oréal and the other defendants argued against consolidating the MDL. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation would review opposition to the MDL.

11.01.22

November 2022

A class action lawsuit was filed against L’Oréal and other hair straightener companies. This case was separate and filed in the Northern District Court of Illinois. The plaintiffs sought restitution for the full purchase price of the products they purchased including hair straighteners and relaxers made by L’Oréal and others. The plaintiffs alleged that the companies didn’t disclose the dangerous endocrine-disrupting chemicals contained in their products.

More lawsuits were filed in nineteen districts. The plaintiffs’ attorneys filed a motion to consolidate the lawsuits into an MDL. Similar cases would be transferred to a single district court if the MDL were approved. MDLs streamline discovery, combine resources and ensure consistency in pre-trial rulings.

10.01.22

October 2022

A study from The National Institutes of Health concluded that women who use hair-straightening products have a higher risk for uterine cancer than women who don’t. Using the products more than four times a year doubled women’s risk of developing uterine cancer.

This study added compelling evidence linking the increase in hormone-related cancers to toxic hair straighteners. This study was released days after the original lawsuits for hair relaxers were filed in Illinois.

A 32-year-old woman filed a lawsuit in Illinois against L’Oréal and other companies. The lawsuit claimed long-term use of hair-straightening products caused the woman’s uterine cancer. L’Oréal and the other named companies allegedly marketed their products as safe and did not warn customers about the increased risk of cancer according to the lawsuit.

09.01.21

September 2021

Carcinogenesis, a peer-reviewed medical journal published an article about a study linking hair products to increased risk of ovarian cancer. The study used data collected by the Sister Study over 10 years. 

View Full Timeline

Frequently asked questions about the hair straightener lawsuit

If you've experienced harm after using a chemical hair straightener, you may have questions about the risks and litigation status. We’ve included the answers to a few frequently asked questions to help. 

How much are people being compensated in hair straightener lawsuits?

Because litigation is still ongoing, no compensation has been offered or paid for cases filed in the hair straightener MDL as of November 2024.

Over 8,390 lawsuits have been filed against hair straightening manufacturers as of November 2024. The lawsuits have not gone to trial and are currently being litigated as of November 2024. Because the litigation is still in process, no settlements or award of verdicts have been paid out at this time. There are never guaranteed levels of compensation before a lawsuit is resolved.

Could I get cancer from using hair straighteners?

Chemical hair straighteners may be linked to uterine, endometrial and ovarian cancers according to some studies. Uterine cancer may be the most closely linked to hair straighteners since frequent use of these products can lead to a higher risk of uterine cancer. 

Who are the plaintiffs of the hair straightener lawsuit?

The majority of the plaintiffs suing chemical hair straightener manufacturers are women who self-identify as Black and have used straightening products for several or many years. These women claim that after using the products regularly and without being aware of the health risks, they developed reproductive cancers. 

If you have a loved one who passed away from health issues caused by chemical hair straighteners, you may be able to file a claim on their behalf and receive compensation if awarded. As of November 2024, the federal MDL is in the discovery phase of litigation. 

Speak to a Motley Rice hair straightener attorney today to learn more about case criteria, eligibility and next steps if you or a loved one has been diagnosed with a reproductive cancer and meet the MDL requirements.

Our hair straightening lawsuit experience

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with a reproductive cancer, we understand how challenging this time can be. Motley Rice is dedicated to helping those who have suffered life-altering health problems after using dangerous products. Our attorneys have led litigation brought by thousands of women harmed by defective products. 

In the past, we’ve worked with people who have suffered major health issues as a result of defective products, such as:

  • Women who developed ovarian cancer after talc-based baby powder
  • Women who suffered breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) allegedly caused by Allergan implants
  • Women who endured complications allegedly caused by Essure® and Paragard® birth control devices and complications from transvaginal mesh
  • Women who had children with birth defects as a result of prescription drugs and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)

If you or a loved one was diagnosed with uterine, endometrial or ovarian cancer after using chemical hair straighteners, consider discussing your options with an attorney who has experience with multidistrict litigation and toxic exposure matters. Litigation with multiple defendants and thousands of plaintiffs is very complex. 

Read more on our women's health litigation experience.

Why are people filing hair straightener lawsuits?

Terms to know about hair straighteners

Scientific evidence linking hair straighteners to cancer?

Cancers that are linked to chemical hair straighteners

Brands named in chemical hair straightener lawsuits

Who is eligible to file a hair straightening products lawsuit?

What should I do if I use hair relaxers and have been diagnosed with cancer?

Hair straightener lawsuit updates and timeline

Frequently asked questions about the hair straightener lawsuit

Our hair straightening lawsuit experience

About the Authors

Sources
  1. American Cancer Society. Formaldehyde and Cancer Risk.
  2. Chang CJ, O’Brien KM, Keil AP, Gaston SA, Jackson CL, Sandler DP, et al. Use of straighteners and other hair products and incident uterine cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Dec 8;114(12):1636–45.
  3. Cleveland clinic. Uterine Cancer (Endometrial Cancer)
  4. Justia. In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation.
  5. Justia. In Re: Hair Relaxer Marketing, Sales, Practices, And Products Liability Litigation No. 1:2023cv00818 - Document 291 (N.D. Ill. 2023).
  6. Justia. Mitchell v. L’Oreal USA, Inc et al. 
  7. La Merrill MA, Vandenberg LN, Smith MT, Goodson W, Browne P, Patisaul HB, et al. Consensus on the key characteristics of endocrine-disrupting chemicals as a basis for hazard identification. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2020 Jan;16(1):45–57.  
  8. Mayo Clinic. Endometrial cancer. 
  9. Mayo Clinic. Ovarian cancer.
  10. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 Jul 27]. Hair straightening chemicals associated with higher uterine cancer risk.
  11. NPR. The FDA is proposing a ban on hair relaxers with formaldehyde due to cancer concerns.
  12. Reuters [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Jul 27]. Dabur India’s two units dismissed as defendants in hair relaxer lawsuit in US.
  13. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. About the Panel. 
  14. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. MDL Statistics Report - Distribution of Pending MDL Dockets by Actions Pending. 
  15. White AJ, Sandler DP, Gaston SA, Jackson CL, O’Brien KM. Use of hair products in relation to ovarian cancer risk. Carcinogenesis. 2021 Oct 5;42(9):1189–95. 
Your Legal Options

Start Your Motley Rice Consultation in Simple Steps

Connect with an Attorney1.800.768.4026

1

Submit Information

Call us or fill out our online form with the details of your potential case.

2

Case Review

Our team reviews your information to assess your potential case.

3

Case Consultation

Talk with us about next steps.