This is an Active case

YouTube Lawsuit

YouTube lawsuits allege that the social media platform profits from knowingly encouraging problematic use and causing various mental health issues in its users.

Connect with an attorney
Child in bed looking at glowing phone

Case Overview

YouTube's parent company, Alphabet, faces lawsuits claiming the platform harmed users. People allege the company designed the website to encourage problematic use. They further claim YouTube targets minors, with little regard for their emotional or mental health. Parents and people harmed by YouTube as minors may be able to file lawsuits.

Important updates about YouTube lawsuits

  • February 2026: There were 2,325 pending actions in the social media MDL.  
  • June 2025: The MDL judge selected the first six school district bellwether trials for the social media MDL. Three defense case picks and three plaintiff school district case picks were chosen. Motley Rice attorneys represent one of the chosen plaintiffs.
  • March 2025: District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled in favor of allowing allegations such as wrongful death and negligence to proceed. Gonzalez Rogers is the federal judge who oversees the social media multidistrict litigation.

Key takeaways about YouTube teen mental health lawsuits

  • Americans are suing social media companies for making their platforms engaging, even at the risk of damaging users’ mental health.
  • The plaintiffs include individuals as minors and their guardians, along with public school boards and state attorneys general.
  • If you believe a minor in your care was harmed by YouTube’s design you may be able to file a lawsuit against YouTube.

Why are people filing teen mental health lawsuits against YouTube?

People are filing lawsuits against YouTube’s parent company, Alphabet, alleging it harmed users’ mental health. They allege the company designed the site to encourage people to engage in harmful behaviors, especially teens and children. They also say Alphabet doesn’t adequately warn parents of the potential dangers associated with using their site.

YouTube has a number of features that present problems for young users, including:

  • Easy access: An internet connection is all you need to access YouTube. Many videos do not require making an account or verifying your age to watch. The YouTube app is also preinstalled on many televisions and phones.
  • Likes and comments: Getting interactions from users has a dopamine-releasing effect on the brain. Creators also have a financial incentive to maximize engagement to help monetize their content.
  • Recommendations and autoplay: These functions make for easy and potentially endless scrolling and watching. With autoplay, users don’t need to take action to watch another video.
  • Short-form content: YouTube Shorts are easy to watch on mobile devices and serve a continuous stream of content.

YouTube’s functions may encourage dangerous behavior in teens that can lead to physical and emotional harm.

Contact a social media addiction lawsuit attorney

Minors with diagnosed mental health issues related to social media use may be eligible for a teen social media harm lawsuit. If you are a parent of a child who has been harmed, or an adult who received a social media-related mental health diagnosis as a minor, contact us today.

You can also reach our team by calling 1.800.768.4026.

What negative behaviors does YouTube encourage in teens?

Keeping users on the site is vital to YouTube’s business model. Alphabet is accused of using knowledge of human behavior and psychology to encourage behaviors that are bad for teens but good for ad revenue, including:

  • Intermittent variable rewards (IVRs): IVRs refer to engagement metrics such as liking, commenting and subscribing. Researchers have found that unpredictability of IVRs may lead to the rush of dopamine people get from gambling.
  • Mindless scrolling: YouTube made it easy for children and teens to enter and spend hours in what experts call a “flow state.” This is a nearly trance-like condition in which staying on the platform requires less energy than moving to a different activity.
  • Parasocial relationships: A parasocial relationship is a one-sided relationship. These are not always dysfunctional, but YouTube’s design and features can encourage problematic parasocial behaviors. Google’s own research shows that 40% of teens believe their favorite YouTube celebrities understand them better than their in-person friends do.
  • Radicalization: Some researchers are concerned that YouTube exposes minors to extreme viewpoints. Studies have shown that YouTube is designed to recommend increasingly extreme content for users to keep them engaged.

On top of all of this, Alphabet also collects massive amounts of data on YouTube users. Children using the site often provide Alphabet data on their location, usage habits, and device type. The company can use this data to target ads to users. This can add fuel to the fire of negative influences on children and teens.

A series of nested circles containing percentages and bars extending to explanations of different levels of YouTube use among teens, with a note beneath describing YouTube as the most popular social media platform for young people.

Harms alleged by people suing YouTube

People suing YouTube allege that its design and features encourage harmful behavior in children and teens, including:

  • Anxiety: Social media users may experience anxiety driven by self-comparison and fear of missing out (FoMO).
  • Cyberbullying: YouTube comment sections can be a place where cyberbullying of content creators and their fans as well as youth users is common.
  • Depression: Social platforms like YouTube often serve up idealized images of body type or lifestyle. Children using YouTube may experience depression, anxiety and body dissatisfaction related to social comparisons on the platform.
  • Self-harm and suicide: In some cases, YouTube has presented suicidal ideation concepts. This can result in suicide or other forms of self-harm.
  • Sleeping disorders: Social media platforms are designed to make people scroll endlessly, possibly resulting in fewer hours of sleep. The blue light from screens and push notifications may also affect sleep quality.

Get help for mental health harms

If you’re facing a mental health crisis or your child is facing one, seek help immediately. These national resources are ready to assist you at any time:

  • National Eating Disorders Association (NEDA): Call 1-800-931-2237 or go to NationalEatingDisorders.org for help.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline: Dial 988 or go to 988lifeline.org for confidential support from a trained expert.

Who is eligible to file a YouTube lawsuit?

Parents and guardians can file lawsuits against social media companies on behalf of their children. They may file for minors who suffered harms, such as eating disorders and depression requiring hospitalization. Young adults who were minors when their trauma was diagnosed may also be eligible.

Compensation from a lawsuit can help people cover costs associated with social media addiction, including medical expenses and lost wages.

What is the current status of social media lawsuits involving YouTube?

As of February 2, 2026, over 2,000 lawsuits have been filed against social media companies like YouTube for harms done to minors. In order to manage the caseload, the federal court system has consolidated them into a multidistrict litigation (MDL). The case is known as In re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 3047.

The companies being sued in this MDL include:

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, is overseeing this MDL.

What is an MDL?

A multidistrict litigation (MDL) case is a federal court action that consolidates cases with similar facts to help the courts operate more efficiently. Unlike a class action, people file lawsuits individually and only have them combined for pretrial matters.

Have people filed a class action lawsuit against YouTube alleging mental health harms?

No, there isn’t a class action lawsuit against YouTube for mental health harm. However, many mental health-related social media lawsuits have been consolidated as an MDL. The people suing YouTube in MDL 3047 allege their mental health suffered due to their use of Alphabet’s platform.

A class action does exist against YouTube, but not for mental health harms. The class action relates to private issues. The people suing allege the company illegally collected and stored information about children’s viewing habits.

YouTube teen mental health lawsuit timeline

2.03.26

MDL pending cases increased

The total number of pending actions in the social media MDL grew to 2,325.

1.05.26

Pending cases number grew

New plaintiffs filed lawsuits in the MDL, bringing the total number of pending actions to 2,243.

12.03.25

Court reported increase in plaintiffs

More plaintiffs joined the MDL. As of December 2, 2025, there were 2,191 pending actions.

11.03.25

More cases filed in MDL

More than 100 new plaintiffs filed lawsuits in the social media mental health MDL throughout October. The total as of November 3 is 2,172.

10.01.25

MDL case count grew leading into October

There are now 2,053 plaintiffs in the Adolescent Social Media Addiction MDL.

09.02.25

MDL cases grew leading into September

The Adolescent Social Media Addiction MDL now has 1,961 pending actions.

08.01.25

MDL continued growing, per August report

There were 1,922 pending actions in the social media MDL.

07.14.25

Minnesota enacted social media mental health warning law

The Minnesota state legislature passed a bill, signed by the state’s governor, that will require social media platforms to include a pop-up warning users that social media can be a mental health hazard. Proponents say the warning will be similar to labels for tobacco and alcohol products. The warning labels are set to take effect July 1, 2026. This is the first law of its type enacted in the U.S.
 

07.02.25

July report showed MDL growth

There were 1,867 pending actions in the social media MDL.

06.18.25

JAMA study linked phone, social media and video game addiction to suicidal behaviors

The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) published a study that examined whether smartphone, social media and video game addiction can be linked to suicidal behaviors. The study looked at nearly 4,300 adolescents over four years. Researchers concluded that the most addicted or increasingly addicted kids in the group were associated with a suicidal risk two to three times higher than that of far less addicted youths.
 

06.17.25

Nevada Attorney General filed YouTube lawsuit

Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford’s office filed a lawsuit against YouTube and its parent companies alleging the platform is causing young people to suffer addictive and mental health harms. Ford said, “I will take every step to protect the children in our great state, and that includes holding accountable those who exploit and harm our youth.”

06.13.25

Vermont governor signed kids digital protection bill

Vermont Governor Phil Scott signed S.69, a bill specifying protection for minors. In addition to privacy measures, the bill requires businesses to avoid using any personal information that results in discrimination, “reasonably foreseeable” emotional distress or “reasonably foreseeable” compulsive use. The law also requires platforms (apps and websites) to set all default privacy settings to the highest level of privacy, further ensuring the protection of minors.
 

06.13.25

Social media MDL Judge selected first bellwether trials

The social media MDL judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers selected the first six bellwether trials for the MDL. Three defense cases and three plaintiff school district cases were chosen for bellwether trials. Five personal injury cases were also selected as bellwethers to proceed to trial. Motley Rice attorneys represent some of the chosen plaintiffs.

04.22.25

Status conference reviewed discovery progress

The parties discussed ongoing disputes over witness depositions, document production and data sharing during the MDL’s status conference on April 22, 2025. While the parties endeavored to resolve several issues by agreement, many discovery issues remain unresolved. The next status conference took place on June 13, 2025.

04.02.25

MDL numbers increased going into April

Nearly 300 plaintiffs have joined the social media MDL since the beginning of March, bringing total pending actions to 1,745.

03.31.25

Texas school districts continued to join MDL

The Corpus Christi Independent School District in Texas voted to join the social media MDL. The district’s attorney claims that 46 school districts statewide have joined the MDL. The district bans smartwatches and cellphones during the school day for students in pre-kindergarten through eighth grade. High school students are limited to using cellphones only during lunch and between classes.

03.30.25

Author of Meta memoir can testify in MDL

U.S. Magistrate Judge Peter H. Kang ruled that the author of a memoir critical of Meta platforms can testify in the MDL. Sarah Wynn-Williams worked at Meta from 2011 to 2017, including time as the company’s director of public policy. Meta attempted to block her from testifying, arguing that her testimony wasn’t relevant to personal injury and that plaintiffs waited too long to depose her.

03.12.25

MDL judge rules against interlocutory appeal

Judge Gonzalez Rogers ruled against the defendants’ request for an interlocutory appeal of the decision that school district plaintiffs can proceed in their claims that defendants’ platforms create a public nuisance. This  ruling aims to maintain coordination among plaintiffs from different states and the Judge said the MDL would “quickly splinter and fragment” if that request was granted.

03.05.25

New lawsuits could challenge Section 230 defense

Snapchat lawsuits filed by more than 60 families claim the app’s features expose children to drug dealers. While the suit names Snapchat the defendant, it could impact other social networks’ defenses built on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Section 230 protects social media companies from liability for content their users create.

03.04.25

Non-priority claims can proceed

Judge Gonzalez Rogers ruled that non-priority claims can go forward. Non-priority claims include general negligence, wrongful death, survival and loss of consortium.

03.03.25

March MDL numbers continued to grow

The social media harm MDL grew to 1,464 pending actions as of March 2025.

02.13.25

Texas’ biggest school district agreed to join social media MDL

The Houston Independent School District board voted unanimously to join the mental health MDL. The lawsuit alleges that social media platforms have reduced students’ attention spans and harmed their mental health. The district seeks recovery  for the educational impact from YouTube, Meta (Facebook, Instagram), TikTok and Snapchat.

02.06.25

San Diego County sued Google and other social media companies

San Diego County filed a lawsuit against social media companies to pressure these companies into removing dangerous features and paying for more mental health resources. The lawsuit claims that YouTube, Snapchat, Facebook, TikTok and Instagram cared more about profiting than protecting the health of those who spend time on their platforms.

02.04.25

MDL Reaches more than 1,000 cases filed

More cases continue to be added to the Adolescent Social Media Addiction MDL. There are now 1,246 pending actions, including those against Google's Youtube.

01.27.25

Milwaukee Public Schools filed social media lawsuit

Wisconsin’s largest school district filed a lawsuit against YouTube, Snapchat, Meta Platforms and TikTok. The Milwaukee Public Schools lawsuit alleges that the social media companies contribute to a youth mental health crisis that impacts students.

01.27.25

Del Norte County joined lawsuit against social media companies

Del Norte County joined other California counties in suing social media companies. The suit alleges that YouTube, TikTok, Meta Platforms and Snapchat knowingly target children.

01.12.25

YouTube must face suit over children’s privacy

Federal Magistrate Judge Susan Van Keulen agreed with plaintiffs that Google, which owns YouTube, collected and held protected user data without permission. The data included information about children’s viewing habits, which may be a violation of federal law. This is a class-action lawsuit separate from the federal MDL.

01.08.25

Apache tribe in Arizona sues social media companies

The White Mountain Apache Tribe filed a federal lawsuit against several social media companies in the Northern District of California, including YouTube’s parent company Google. The tribe claims  social media companies are contributing to mental health crises among its youth. The lawsuit’s allegations also fall under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO.

01.03.25

More than a 100 cases added to the social media MDL

Pending actions in the social media harm MDL grew to 974 as of January 2.

12.01.24

More cases filed in the social media harm MDL

The number of plaintiffs in MDL-3047 increased to 815.

11.08.24

Meta CEO not personally liable, judge rules

Judge Gonzalez Rogers ruled that Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is not personally liable in lawsuits alleging that social media companies deliberately addicted children to social media. The judge found plaintiffs’ allegations weren’t specific enough to establish his personal liability.

10.24.24

School district lawsuits could proceed in the social media harm MDL

U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled in October 2024 that lawsuits filed by school districts could proceed as part of MDL 3047 against Google and other companies involved in social media. YouTube is owned by Google, which is a subsidiary of Alphabet – a publicly traded company established in 2015.

Schools districts have filed suits alleging that the design of social media apps have caused mental health harm to students in the schools’ communities. These mental health issues have led to disruptions throughout schools and resulted in increased costs as districts try to help their students navigate the negative influence of social media.

09.01.24

Number of actions in social media MDL grew again

The number of plaintiffs in MDL-3047 grew to 584. The MDL included 393 plaintiffs as of January 2024.

08.01.24

Number of actions in social media MDL grew

On August 1, the number of plaintiffs in MDL-3047 was 557.

07.30.24

U.S. Senate passed two protection acts

The U.S. Senate passed the Kids Online Safety Act and the Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act. If this legislation passes in the U.S. House of Representatives, social media platforms will have to take reasonable measures to improve parental control over their children’s social media use and reduce social media-related harm to teens and children.

06.08.24

New York passed two safety bills

Legislators in New York passed two major bills into law to address how social media companies can exploit children. The Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation (SAFE) For Kids Act requires thorough verification of the user’s age, as well as parental consent in certain cases. The legislation also contains other protections for minors who use social media platforms.

The New York Child Data Protection Act regulates social media sites’ ability to collect, sell and share the data of minors.

01.04.24

Pretrial schedule set

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers set a pretrial schedule to select the first bellwether trials for MDL-3047.

02.01.23

Master complaint filed

Attorneys representing plaintiffs in MDL-3047 filed a master complaint.

11.2022

Leadership team approved

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers approved a leadership team for MDL 3047. Motley Rice attorney Previn Warren was named the team’s co-lead counsel.

10.2022

Courts consolidated lawsuits

The U.S. courts consolidated lawsuits against TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat and other social media platforms into an MDL docket.

03.2022

Attorneys general wrote to social media companies

Attorneys general from 44 states and territories wrote to social media companies’ legal counsel to open a discussion about the lack of parental controls on popular platforms.

View Full Timeline

Our experience helping families stand against technology companies

For decades, families and individuals have turned to Motley Rice for help in standing up to big tech companies. We’ve represented people who have reason to think they have been harmed by social media companies like Alphabet.

If you believe a social media company caused a mental health crisis for you or your child, we might be able to help you file a lawsuit.

Learn more about our experience advocating for people who allege harms caused by technology and media companies.

Important updates about YouTube lawsuits

Key takeaways

Why are people filing teen mental health lawsuits against YouTube?

Who is eligible to file a YouTube lawsuit?

What is the current status of social media lawsuits involving YouTube?

YouTube teen mental health lawsuit timeline

Our experience helping families stand against technology companies

About the Author

Sources
  1. The Associated Press. Arkansas sues YouTube over claims that the site is fueling a mental health crisis.
  2. Bloomberg Law. Tech Giants Denied Prompt Appeal in Schools' Addiction Suit.
  3. CBS 8. County files lawsuit against 5 major social media platforms to improve youth mental health crisis.
  4. Corpus Christi Caller Times. Social media addiction: CCISD wants to join lawsuit against Instagram, TikTok, others.
  5. Courthouse News. Google can’t shake class claims it invaded minors’ privacy through ads.
  6. Houston Landing. Houston ISD to join lawsuit against social media companies over student mental health.
  7. Houston Public Media. Houston ISD joining nationwide group of school districts in suing social media companies.
  8. Las Vegas Review-Journal. Nevada attorney general files lawsuit against YouTube.
  9. Law 360. 'Careless People' Author Can Testify In Meta Addiction MDL.
  10. Law360. Social Media Addiction MDL Judge Picks Bellwether Trial Pool.
  11. Los Angeles Times. Parents are blaming Snapchat for their teens’ fentanyl deaths. Will an L.A. lawsuit shape the future of social media?
  12. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Milwaukee Public Schools to sue social media companies over youth mental health crisis.
  13. MPR News. Minnesota enacts first-in-nation law requiring mental health warnings on social media.
  14. News4. Nevada attorney general sues YouTube over kids addicted to platform.
  15. NPR. Screen addiction and suicidal behaviors are linked for teens, a study shows.
  16. PCMag. School Districts Notch a Win in Tech Addiction Case Against Top Platforms.
  17. Politico. Bill banning social media for youngsters advances.
  18. The Recorder. With Final Dismissal Order, Social Media Addiction Claims Head Toward Trial.
  19. Redwood Voice. Del Norte Joins Public Nuisance Lawsuit Against Social Media Giants.
  20. Reuters. Meta's Zuckerberg not liable in lawsuits over social media harm to children.
  21. Transparency Coalition. Vermont Gov. Scott signs ‘Kids Code’ digital design bill into law.
  22. State of California Department of Justice. Attorney General Bonta Sues Trump Administration over Unlawful Discontinuation of School Mental Health Grant Funding.
  23. U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. Case No. 19-cv-07016-SVK.
  24. U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. Joint Status Report on Discovery for April 22, 2025 Discovery Management Conference, In re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation.
  25. U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Pending MDLs.
  26. Variety. YouTube Now Worth as Much as $550 Billion, Analysts Say: ‘New King of All Media'.
  27. Xiao Y, Meng Y, Brown TT, Keyes KM, Mann JJ. Addictive Screen Use Trajectories and Suicidal Behaviors, Suicidal Ideation, and Mental Health in US Youths. JAMA. 2025;334(3):219–228. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.782
Your Legal Options

Start Your Motley Rice Consultation in Simple Steps

Connect with an Attorney1.800.768.4026

1

Submit Information

Call us or fill out our online form with the details of your potential case.

2

Case Review

Our team reviews your information to assess your potential case.

3

Case Consultation

Talk with us about next steps.