Skip to main content

We are accepting new cases

YouTube Lawsuit

YouTube lawsuits allege that the social media platform profits from knowingly encouraging problematic use that causes various mental health issues in its users.

Connect with an attorneyCheck Eligibility
Child in bed looking at glowing phone
Indicates required field

Connect with a Teen Social Media Lawsuit attorney

This form will help you get in touch with our staff about Teen Social Media Lawsuit. If you have any questions, please complete this form or call 1.800.768.4026. Not the case you were looking for? Start a new form here.

  1. 1 Contact Information Tell us about yourself.

  2. 2 Case Details What should we know about your case?

  3. 3 Completion Thank you for reaching out!

State

To file a social media harm lawsuit, you will need the following:

  1. A diagnosis from a medical or mental health professional of self-harm, eating disorders, suicidal activities or ideation, depression or anxiety
  2. To have experienced these issues before your 18th birthday (as a minor)
  3. People who developed social media-related mental health issues after their 18th birthday are likely not eligible to file a lawsuit at this time. The current lawsuits focus on harms done to minors.

Please keep in mind, state statutes of limitations apply to all lawsuits. Generally, this means you need to file your case within 1 – 3 years of the harm occurring, but this does vary by state.

* Indicates a required field

Have you or a loved one developed a brain disorder, such as encephalitis or meningoencephalitis, after taking Zinbryta?
Did you or a loved one consume recalled WanaBana Apple Cinnamon Pouches?
Have you or a loved been diagnosed with lead poisoning after consuming the product?
Have you experienced serious health issues associated with transvaginal mesh?
Have you had one or more revision surgeries as a result of mesh?
Were you exposed to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) “forever chemicals”, either through aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) or another source?
Select all that apply
Were you diagnosed with any of the following conditions after PFAS exposure?
Select all that apply
Do you rent/own property or a business that was impacted by the Norfolk Southern train derailment?
Do you own any livestock that have incurred medical expense or have passed away as a result of Norfolk Southern train derailment?
Are you experiencing any new medical conditions or injuries since the train derailed?
Were you implanted with a metal-on-metal hip replacement device?
Have you or a loved one ever used one of the following insulin pumps?
  • 600 series Medtronic MiniMed™️ Insulin Pump - Model 670G
  • 600 series Medtronic MiniMed™️ Insulin Pump - Model 640 G
  • 600 series Medtronic MiniMed™️ Insulin Pump - Model 630 G
  • 600 series Medtronic MiniMed™️ Insulin Pump - Model 620 G
If you answered “yes” to the previous question, which model did you or a loved one use?
* We are not currently handling pain pump cases.
Have you or a loved one experienced any of the following side effects?
Select all that apply
Have you had a retrievable IVC filter surgically implanted after Jan. 1, 2003?
Have you experienced any side effects? Select all that apply
Have you or a loved one been victim to human trafficking?
Were you or a loved one harmed by Hamas?
Only certain people are allowed to bring a claim using these laws. Are you a:
Make and Model
Do you believe your insurance company has charged you more than the actual cost of medical services or products?
Have you been burned or injured by a defective device?
Have you had an endoscopy between Jan. 1, 2010 and Oct. 31, 2015?
Were you injured by an EFP in Iraq between the Fall of 2005 and December 2012?
Do you use a Dexcom device and Dexcom App?
Have you experienced any of the following side effects?
Have you or a loved one been injured in an accident where your vehicle failed to perform as the manufacturer intended?
Have you or an immediate family member been diagnosed with Parkinson's disease?
How were you exposed to the herbicide paraquat?
Have you or a loved one been victim to sexual abuse?
Was a family member the perpetrator of the abuse?
Have you or a loved one been exposed to hair relaxer products?
Have you or a loved one been diagnosed with one or more of the following conditions?
Were you injured on a plane or in an airport or other transportation facility?
Did your injuries require significant medical treatment or hospitalization?
Were you arrested and jailed in an airport or other transportation facility?
Were you released without charges, prosecution, guilty pleas, or convictions of charges?
Have you been exposed to Roundup products and developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)?
Where were you exposed to Roundup?
In what capacity were you at Camp Lejeune?
Were you or a loved one diagnosed with any of the following health complications?
Have you or your child been diagnosed with an eating disorder or attempted/died by suicide that you believe was influenced by social media?
Did Instagram contribute to the diagnosis or injury?
Which other technology contributed to the diagnosis or injury? (Check all that apply)
Did your child begin using social media before age 10?
Were you exposed to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) "forever chemicals," either through aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) or another source? Choose all applicable.
Were you diagnosed with any of the following conditions after exposure?
Did you use artificial tears and subsequently suffer from vision loss?
Which artificial tear product(s) did you use?
Do you know where you were exposed to asbestos?
Do you own 2011-2015 model Audi or Volkswagen with a 3.0 Liter TFSI engine?
Make & Model
Did your child develop NEC after consuming cow milk-based formulas?
Did your baby develop complications after consuming a recalled product made by Abbott Nutrition?
Do you have evidence your child consumed a recalled formula?
Did your loved one consume baby food on a regular basis from one of the following manufacturers:
Do you still have any of these products?
Has your loved one been diagnosed by a medical professional with
Was that diagnosis before the age of 14 years old?
Did you have a breast implant procedure?
Have you been diagnosed with breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL)?
Did you use talcum powder?
Have you been diagnosed with ovarian cancer after talcum powder use?
Which GLP-1 RA product did you take?
Which GLP-1 RA product(s) did you take?
Select all that apply
Are you still taking a GLP-1 RA product?
Have you been hospitalized or required medical care for any of the following conditions after taking GLP-1 RAs?
Select all that apply
Did you use a telehealth provider (e.g., Noom, Hims/Hers, Ro, etc.) to get your prescription
Have you or a loved one had a hernia surgically repaired using mesh?
Did you have problems following the initial hernia surgery?
Was the initial hernia surgery after January 1, 2000?
Have you had a hernia revision surgery because of faulty hernia mesh, not hernia reoccurrence?
Have you used a Paragard IUD?
Have you experienced any side effects?
Select all that apply
Have you had a hysterectomy or another surgery to remove this device?
Did you use Depo-Provera or a related product?
Did you develop meningioma (a type of brain or spinal tumor) after taking this medication?
Did you lose an embryo during an IVF procedure that used CooperSurgical IVF fluid?
Is your vehicle equipped with Onstar?
Did you download your vehicles MyCAR app (MyBuick, MyGMC, MyCadillac, or MyChevrolet)?
Did your insurance change after enabling OnStar's Smart Driver Program?
Have you or a loved one experienced a serious injury that resulted in medical expenses, loss of income, long-term care or rehabilitation?
Did the injury require hospitalization?
Have you been diagnosed with an injury following exposure to a contamination of your home, health or the environment?
Were you or a loved one pregnant while living near or working on a farm that applied DCPA?
Did the child from that pregnancy suffer from any birth issues, neurological deficits or low birth weight?
Have you or a loved been diagnosed with lead poisoning after exposure to lead?
What type of fraud do you have information about?
Which Sony PlayStation consoles did you purchase?
Where did you purchase digital games?
Do you have receipts for your PlayStation digital game purchases from a retailer?
Did you or a loved one suffer an infection after an endoscopy?
Have you had a surgery in the breast region where a surgical mesh product was used?
Do you know the name of the product used in your surgery?
Which side effects did you experience after the mesh was placed?
Have you had removal surgery?
Were you diagnosed with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma after taking Dupixent (or any lymphoma subtypes)?
Were you or a loved one sexual assaulted by a rideshare driver during or after a rideshare service?
Which rideshare service facilitated the abuse?
Do you have the ride receipt, trip record, or any other documentation relating to the ride during which you or your loved one was sexually assaulted?
Have you or a loved one been diagnosed with skin cancer after using a UV gel nail dryer?
Did the cancer originate on your fingers, toes, or the surrounding skin?
Have you or a loved one been victim to labor trafficking?
Have you or a loved one been victim of wrongful imprisonment?

Warning message

*We can no longer take clients alleging harm from the following products: Essure, Mirena IUD, NuvaRing, Yaz/Yasmin, among others.
Did you experience a vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC)?
Were you or a loved one harmed by a U.S. Government designated terrorist organization?
Are you a:
Have you or a loved one experienced problems after having a spinal cord stimulator implanted?
Which of the following injuries have you experienced? Select all that apply
500 character limit

By submitting this form, I agree that Motley Rice LLC may collect my information and use it pursuant to its privacy policy.

I agree

Case Overview

YouTube and its parent company, Google, face lawsuits alleging they designed the platform to encourage problematic use that contributes to mental health harms, especially among children and teens. Parents and adults who were harmed as minors may be eligible to file a YouTube lawsuit seeking accountability.

Important updates about YouTube lawsuits

  • October 2026: As of the start of the month, there were 3,824 actions pending in the social media MDL.
  • June 2026: Google has settled another teen social media harm case ahead of its scheduled trial. The case was scheduled to go to trial in state court in July.
  • May 2026: YouTube and others settled a suit brought by a school district in Kentucky. The trial was scheduled for June 2026 and was meant to be the first school district bellwether trial.

Key takeaways about YouTube teen mental health lawsuits

  • People are filing YouTube lawsuits alleging the platform design contributed to mental health harms in children and teens.
  • Parents, guardians and adults who were harmed as minors may be eligible to pursue a YouTube lawsuit.
  • If you believe YouTube contributed to your or your child’s mental health condition, an attorney can evaluate whether you may have a claim.

Why are people filing YouTube lawsuits?

People are filing lawsuits against YouTube’s parent company, Alphabet, alleging it harmed users’ mental health. They allege the company designed the site to encourage people to engage in harmful behaviors, and that the company doesn’t adequately warn parents of the potential dangers associated with using their site.

YouTube has a number of features that present problems for young users, including:

  • Easy access: An internet connection is all you need to access YouTube. Many videos do not require making an account or verifying your age to watch. The YouTube app is also preinstalled on many televisions and phones.
  • Likes and comments: Getting interactions from users has a dopamine-releasing effect on the brain. Creators also have a financial incentive to maximize engagement to help monetize their content.
  • Recommendations and autoplay: These functions make for easy and potentially endless scrolling and watching. With autoplay, users don’t need to take action to watch another video.
  • Short-form content: YouTube Shorts are easy to watch on mobile devices and serve a continuous stream of content.

YouTube functions may encourage dangerous behavior in teens that can lead to physical and emotional harm. School districts and state attorneys general have also filed lawsuits against social media companies like Alphabet.

Contact a social media addiction lawsuit attorney

Minors with diagnosed mental health issues related to social media use may be eligible for a teen social media harm lawsuit. If you are a parent of a child who has been harmed, or an adult who received a social media-related mental health diagnosis as a minor, contact us today.

You can also reach our team by calling 1.800.768.4026.

How does YouTube encourage addictive behavior?

Keeping users on the site is vital to the YouTube business model. Alphabet is accused of using knowledge of human behavior and psychology to encourage behaviors that are bad for teens but good for ad revenue, including:

  • Intermittent variable rewards (IVRs): IVRs refer to engagement metrics such as liking, commenting and subscribing. Researchers have found that unpredictability of IVRs may lead to a similar rush of dopamine people get from gambling.
  • Mindless scrolling: YouTube made it easy for children and teens to enter and spend hours in what experts call a “flow state.” This state is a nearly trance-like condition in which staying on the platform requires less energy than moving to a different activity.
  • Parasocial relationships: A parasocial relationship is a one-sided relationship. They are not always dysfunctional, but the YouTube design and features can encourage problematic parasocial behaviors. Google’s own research shows that 40% of teens believe their favorite YouTube celebrities understand them better than their in-person friends do.
  • Radicalization: Some researchers are concerned that YouTube exposes minors to extreme viewpoints. Studies have shown that YouTube is designed to recommend increasingly extreme content for users to keep them engaged.

On top of all of this, Alphabet also collects massive amounts of data on YouTube users. Children using the site often provide Alphabet data on their location, usage habits and device type. The company can use this data to target ads to users. This can add fuel to the fire of negative influences on children and teens.

Harms alleged by people suing YouTube

People suing YouTube allege that its design and features encourage harmful behavior in children and teens, including:

  • Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): ADHD is a neurodevelopmental disorder marked by ongoing patterns of inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity that interfere with daily functioning and development. Some lawsuits allege excessive social media use may contribute to attention problems or worsen ADHD symptoms in children and teens.
  • Anxiety: Social media users may experience anxiety driven by self-comparison and fear of missing out (FOMO).
  • Cyberbullying: YouTube comment sections can be a place where cyberbullying of content creators, their fans and young users is common.
  • Depression: Social platforms like YouTube frequently showcase idealized lifestyles, achievements and daily routines. When children compare their own lives to these curated representations, it can lead to low self-esteem and depression.
  • Self-harm and suicide: In some cases, YouTube has presented suicidal ideation concepts. This can result in suicide or other forms of self-harm.
  • Sleeping disorders: Social media platforms are designed to make people scroll endlessly, possibly resulting in fewer hours of sleep. The blue light from screens and push notifications may also affect sleep quality.
     

Get help for mental health harms

If you’re facing a mental health crisis or your child is facing one, seek help immediately. These national resources are ready to assist you at any time:

  • National Eating Disorders Association (NEDA): Call 1-800-931-2237 or go to NationalEatingDisorders.org for help.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline: Dial 988 or go to 988lifeline.org for confidential support from a trained expert.
     

What is the current status of social media lawsuits involving YouTube?

YouTube lawsuits are moving forward in 2026 as thousands of claims against social media companies for harm to minors proceed through federal and state court systems. To manage the federal caseload, cases have been consolidated into one multidistrict litigation docket (MDL) to manage the caseload. 

An MDL is the result of a federal court action that consolidates many cases with similar facts into one federal court. The MDL helps the court system operate more efficiently by combining pretrial tasks. In an MDL, people file lawsuits individually. The process is different from a class action lawsuit where one person or group files a lawsuit on behalf of a class of plaintiffs.

The companies being sued in this MDL include:

The case is known as In re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 3047. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, is overseeing the MDL.

Who can file a social media harm lawsuit? Parents or guardians can file a lawsuit against social media companies on behalf of their minor children who suffered mental health harms. These harms include suicidal ideation, eating disorders and depression that requires hospitalization. Young adults can also file a lawsuit if they were minors when their trauma was diagnosed or treated.

YouTube lawsuit news and recent updates

10.01.26

MDL cases grew leading into October

The social media MDL grew to 3,824 pending actions.

09.02.26

September report showed MDL growth

The social media MDL grew to 3,208 pending actions.

08.03.26

MDL cases grew leading into August

There were 3,137 pending actions in the social media MDL.

07.01.26

July report showed MDL growth

The social media MDL increased to 2,893 pending actions.

06.23.26

California state court case settles

Google has settled another teen social media harm case ahead of its scheduled trial. The case was scheduled to go to trial in state court in July.

06.01.26

MDL numbers grew leading into June

There were 2,664 pending actions in the social media MDL.

05.15.26

Bellwether trial settled before beginning

Google and others settled a suit brought by the Breathitt County School District in Kentucky. A trial had been scheduled for June 2026 and was expected to be the first school district bellwether trial.

05.01.26

May report showed MDL growth

There were 2,527 pending actions in the social media MDL.

04.01.26

MDL numbers increased leading into April

There were 2,465 pending actions in the social media MDL.

03.25.26

Jury verdict against Google & Meta announced

A California jury held that the addictive designs of both tech giant platforms directly caused the plaintiffs’ severe mental health issues, awarding $6 million in damages.

03.02.26

March MDL report shows slight growth

The social media MDL now has 2,407 pending actions.

02.09.26

State-level bellwether trial begins

The first California state-level bellwether trial in the social media addiction litigation started February 9, 2026, in the Los Angeles Superior Court. The first days of the trial focused on unsealing internal corporate documents, specifically emails where employees allegedly compared their apps to “drugs” and discussed “reward deficit disorder” caused by excessive scrolling. The outcome could affect settlement discussions in the federal MDL. 

02.03.26

MDL pending cases increased

The total number of pending actions in the social media MDL grew to 2,325.

01.05.26

Pending cases number grew

New plaintiffs filed lawsuits in the MDL, bringing the total number of pending actions to 2,243.

12.03.25

Court reported increase in plaintiffs

More plaintiffs joined the MDL. As of December 2, 2025, there were 2,191 pending actions.

11.03.25

More cases filed in MDL

More than 100 new plaintiffs filed lawsuits in the social media mental health MDL throughout October. The total as of November 3 is 2,172.

10.01.25

MDL case count grew leading into October

There are now 2,053 plaintiffs in the Adolescent Social Media Addiction MDL.

09.02.25

MDL cases grew leading into September

The Adolescent Social Media Addiction MDL now has 1,961 pending actions.

08.01.25

MDL continued growing, per August report

There were 1,922 pending actions in the social media MDL.

07.14.25

Minnesota enacted social media mental health warning law

The Minnesota state legislature passed a bill, signed by the state’s governor, that will require social media platforms to include a pop-up warning users that social media can be a mental health hazard. Proponents say the warning will be similar to labels for tobacco and alcohol products. The warning labels are set to take effect July 1, 2026. This is the first law of its type enacted in the U.S.
 

07.02.25

July report showed MDL growth

There were 1,867 pending actions in the social media MDL.

06.18.25

JAMA study linked phone, social media and video game addiction to suicidal behaviors

The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) published a study that examined whether smartphone, social media and video game addiction can be linked to suicidal behaviors. The study looked at nearly 4,300 adolescents over four years. Researchers concluded that the most addicted or increasingly addicted kids in the group were associated with a suicidal risk two to three times higher than that of far less addicted youths.
 

06.17.25

Nevada Attorney General filed YouTube lawsuit

Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford’s office filed a lawsuit against YouTube and its parent companies alleging the platform is causing young people to suffer addictive and mental health harms. Ford said, “I will take every step to protect the children in our great state, and that includes holding accountable those who exploit and harm our youth.”

06.13.25

Vermont governor signed kids digital protection bill

Vermont Governor Phil Scott signed S.69, a bill specifying protection for minors. In addition to privacy measures, the bill requires businesses to avoid using any personal information that results in discrimination, “reasonably foreseeable” emotional distress or “reasonably foreseeable” compulsive use. The law also requires platforms (apps and websites) to set all default privacy settings to the highest level of privacy, further ensuring the protection of minors.
 

06.13.25

Social media MDL Judge selected first bellwether trials

The social media MDL judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers selected the first six bellwether trials for the MDL. Three defense cases and three plaintiff school district cases were chosen for bellwether trials. Five personal injury cases were also selected as bellwethers to proceed to trial. Motley Rice attorneys represent some of the chosen plaintiffs.

04.22.25

Status conference reviewed discovery progress

The parties discussed ongoing disputes over witness depositions, document production and data sharing during the MDL’s status conference on April 22, 2025. While the parties endeavored to resolve several issues by agreement, many discovery issues remain unresolved. The next status conference took place on June 13, 2025.

04.02.25

MDL numbers increased going into April

Nearly 300 plaintiffs have joined the social media MDL since the beginning of March, bringing total pending actions to 1,745.

03.31.25

Texas school districts continued to join MDL

The Corpus Christi Independent School District in Texas voted to join the social media MDL. The district’s attorney claims that 46 school districts statewide have joined the MDL. The district bans smartwatches and cellphones during the school day for students in pre-kindergarten through eighth grade. High school students are limited to using cellphones only during lunch and between classes.

03.30.25

Author of Meta memoir can testify in MDL

U.S. Magistrate Judge Peter H. Kang ruled that the author of a memoir critical of Meta platforms can testify in the MDL. Sarah Wynn-Williams worked at Meta from 2011 to 2017, including time as the company’s director of public policy. Meta attempted to block her from testifying, arguing that her testimony wasn’t relevant to personal injury and that plaintiffs waited too long to depose her.

03.12.25

MDL judge rules against interlocutory appeal

Judge Gonzalez Rogers ruled against the defendants’ request for an interlocutory appeal of the decision that school district plaintiffs can proceed in their claims that defendants’ platforms create a public nuisance. This  ruling aims to maintain coordination among plaintiffs from different states and the Judge said the MDL would “quickly splinter and fragment” if that request was granted.

03.05.25

New lawsuits could challenge Section 230 defense

Snapchat lawsuits filed by more than 60 families claim the app’s features expose children to drug dealers. While the suit names Snapchat the defendant, it could impact other social networks’ defenses built on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Section 230 protects social media companies from liability for content their users create.

03.04.25

Non-priority claims can proceed

Judge Gonzalez Rogers ruled that non-priority claims can go forward. Non-priority claims include general negligence, wrongful death, survival and loss of consortium.

03.03.25

March MDL numbers continued to grow

The social media harm MDL grew to 1,464 pending actions as of March 2025.

02.13.25

Texas’ biggest school district agreed to join social media MDL

The Houston Independent School District board voted unanimously to join the mental health MDL. The lawsuit alleges that social media platforms have reduced students’ attention spans and harmed their mental health. The district seeks recovery  for the educational impact from YouTube, Meta (Facebook, Instagram), TikTok and Snapchat.

02.06.25

San Diego County sued Google and other social media companies

San Diego County filed a lawsuit against social media companies to pressure these companies into removing dangerous features and paying for more mental health resources. The lawsuit claims that YouTube, Snapchat, Facebook, TikTok and Instagram cared more about profiting than protecting the health of those who spend time on their platforms.

02.04.25

MDL Reaches more than 1,000 cases filed

More cases continue to be added to the Adolescent Social Media Addiction MDL. There are now 1,246 pending actions, including those against Google's Youtube.

01.27.25

Milwaukee Public Schools filed social media lawsuit

Wisconsin’s largest school district filed a lawsuit against YouTube, Snapchat, Meta Platforms and TikTok. The Milwaukee Public Schools lawsuit alleges that the social media companies contribute to a youth mental health crisis that impacts students.

01.27.25

Del Norte County joined lawsuit against social media companies

Del Norte County joined other California counties in suing social media companies. The suit alleges that YouTube, TikTok, Meta Platforms and Snapchat knowingly target children.

01.12.25

YouTube must face suit over children’s privacy

Federal Magistrate Judge Susan Van Keulen agreed with plaintiffs that Google, which owns YouTube, collected and held protected user data without permission. The data included information about children’s viewing habits, which may be a violation of federal law. This is a class-action lawsuit separate from the federal MDL.

01.08.25

Apache tribe in Arizona sues social media companies

The White Mountain Apache Tribe filed a federal lawsuit against several social media companies in the Northern District of California, including YouTube’s parent company Google. The tribe claims  social media companies are contributing to mental health crises among its youth. The lawsuit’s allegations also fall under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO.

01.03.25

More than a 100 cases added to the social media MDL

Pending actions in the social media harm MDL grew to 974 as of January 2.

12.01.24

More cases filed in the social media harm MDL

The number of plaintiffs in MDL-3047 increased to 815.

11.08.24

Meta CEO not personally liable, judge rules

Judge Gonzalez Rogers ruled that Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is not personally liable in lawsuits alleging that social media companies deliberately addicted children to social media. The judge found plaintiffs’ allegations weren’t specific enough to establish his personal liability.

10.24.24

School district lawsuits could proceed in the social media harm MDL

U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled in October 2024 that lawsuits filed by school districts could proceed as part of MDL 3047 against Google and other companies involved in social media. YouTube is owned by Google, which is a subsidiary of Alphabet – a publicly traded company established in 2015.

Schools districts have filed suits alleging that the design of social media apps have caused mental health harm to students in the schools’ communities. These mental health issues have led to disruptions throughout schools and resulted in increased costs as districts try to help their students navigate the negative influence of social media.

09.01.24

Number of actions in social media MDL grew again

The number of plaintiffs in MDL-3047 grew to 584. The MDL included 393 plaintiffs as of January 2024.

08.01.24

Number of actions in social media MDL grew

On August 1, the number of plaintiffs in MDL-3047 was 557.

07.30.24

U.S. Senate passed two protection acts

The U.S. Senate passed the Kids Online Safety Act and the Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act. If this legislation passes in the U.S. House of Representatives, social media platforms will have to take reasonable measures to improve parental control over their children’s social media use and reduce social media-related harm to teens and children.

06.08.24

New York passed two safety bills

Legislators in New York passed two major bills into law to address how social media companies can exploit children. The Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation (SAFE) For Kids Act requires thorough verification of the user’s age, as well as parental consent in certain cases. The legislation also contains other protections for minors who use social media platforms.

The New York Child Data Protection Act regulates social media sites’ ability to collect, sell and share the data of minors.

01.04.24

Pretrial schedule set

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers set a pretrial schedule to select the first bellwether trials for MDL-3047.

02.01.23

Master complaint filed

Attorneys representing plaintiffs in MDL-3047 filed a master complaint.

11.2022

Leadership team approved

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers approved a leadership team for MDL 3047. Motley Rice attorney Previn Warren was named the team’s co-lead counsel.

10.2022

Courts consolidated lawsuits

The U.S. courts consolidated lawsuits against TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat and other social media platforms into an MDL docket.

03.2022

Attorneys general wrote to social media companies

Attorneys general from 44 states and territories wrote to social media companies’ legal counsel to open a discussion about the lack of parental controls on popular platforms.

View Full Timeline

Frequently asked questions about YouTube lawsuits

Can I sue YouTube?

Parents and guardians may be able to file a lawsuit on behalf of a child who suffered mental health harms allegedly linked to YouTube. Adults who were diagnosed or treated for these harms while they were minors may also qualify. An attorney can evaluate your circumstances and explain your legal options.

How do I file a lawsuit against YouTube?

The first step is speaking with an attorney who handles social media harm litigation. They can review your or your child's medical history, YouTube use and other evidence to determine whether you may qualify to file a YouTube lawsuit.

Is there a YouTube class action lawsuit?

Although many people search for a YouTube class action lawsuit, most mental health claims against YouTube are being handled through multidistrict litigation (MDL No. 3047), not a traditional class action. Each plaintiff files an individual lawsuit while certain pretrial proceedings are coordinated.

Our experience helping families stand against technology companies

For decades, families and individuals have turned to Motley Rice for help in standing up to big tech companies. We’ve represented people who have reason to think they have been harmed by social media companies like Alphabet. In addition, Motley Rice holds leadership positions in the social media MDL, with attorney member Previn Warren appointed as co-lead counsel.

If you believe a social media company caused a mental health crisis for you or your child, we might be able to help you file a lawsuit.

Read more about our social media mental health litigation experience.

Why are people filing YouTube lawsuits?

How does YouTube encourage addictive behavior?

Harms alleged by people suing YouTube

What is the current status of social media lawsuits involving YouTube?

YouTube lawsuit news and recent updates

Frequently asked questions about YouTube lawsuits

Our experience helping families stand against technology companies

About the Author

Sources
  1. The Associated Press. Arkansas sues YouTube over claims that the site is fueling a mental health crisis.
  2. Bloomberg Law. Tech Giants Denied Prompt Appeal in Schools' Addiction Suit.
  3. CBS 8. County files lawsuit against 5 major social media platforms to improve youth mental health crisis.
  4. Corpus Christi Caller Times. Social media addiction: CCISD wants to join lawsuit against Instagram, TikTok, others.
  5. Courthouse News. Google can’t shake class claims it invaded minors’ privacy through ads.
  6. Houston Landing. Houston ISD to join lawsuit against social media companies over student mental health.
  7. Houston Public Media. Houston ISD joining nationwide group of school districts in suing social media companies.
  8. Jurist. Meta settles first lawsuit over harm to children’s mental health 
  9. Las Vegas Review-Journal. Nevada attorney general files lawsuit against YouTube.
  10. Law 360. 'Careless People' Author Can Testify In Meta Addiction MDL.
  11. Law360. Social Media Addiction MDL Judge Picks Bellwether Trial Pool.
  12. Los Angeles Times. Parents are blaming Snapchat for their teens’ fentanyl deaths. Will an L.A. lawsuit shape the future of social media?
  13. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Milwaukee Public Schools to sue social media companies over youth mental health crisis.
  14. MPR News. Minnesota enacts first-in-nation law requiring mental health warnings on social media.
  15. News4. Nevada attorney general sues YouTube over kids addicted to platform.
  16. NPR. Screen addiction and suicidal behaviors are linked for teens, a study shows.
  17. National Public Radio. Meta and YouTube head to trial over harm to children after TikTok settles
  18. PBS News. Instagram and YouTube found liable in landmark social media addiction trial in California.
  19. PCMag. School Districts Notch a Win in Tech Addiction Case Against Top Platforms.
  20. Politico. Bill banning social media for youngsters advances.
  21. The Recorder. With Final Dismissal Order, Social Media Addiction Claims Head Toward Trial.
  22. Redwood Voice. Del Norte Joins Public Nuisance Lawsuit Against Social Media Giants.
  23. Reuters. Meta's Zuckerberg not liable in lawsuits over social media harm to children.
  24. Transparency Coalition. Vermont Gov. Scott signs ‘Kids Code’ digital design bill into law.
  25. State of California Department of Justice. Attorney General Bonta Sues Trump Administration over Unlawful Discontinuation of School Mental Health Grant Funding.
  26. U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. Case No. 19-cv-07016-SVK.
  27. U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. Joint Status Report on Discovery for April 22, 2025 Discovery Management Conference, In re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation.
  28. U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Pending MDLs.
  29. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
  30. The Guardian Meta and YouTube designed addictive products that harmed young people, jury finds.
  31. Variety. YouTube Now Worth as Much as $550 Billion, Analysts Say: ‘New King of All Media'.
  32. Xiao Y, Meng Y, Brown TT, Keyes KM, Mann JJ. Addictive Screen Use Trajectories and Suicidal Behaviors, Suicidal Ideation, and Mental Health in US Youths. JAMA. 2025;334(3):219–228. doi:10.1001/jama.2025.782
Your Legal Options

Start Your Motley Rice Consultation in Simple Steps

Connect with an Attorney1.800.768.4026

1

Submit Information

Call us or fill out our online form with the details of your potential case.

2

Case Review

Our team reviews your information to assess your potential case.

3

Case Consultation

Talk with us about next steps.