This is an Active case

Snapchat Lawsuit

People are filing lawsuits against Snap, Inc. for causing mental health issues for younger users. The lawsuits claim Snap’s features encourage children to compulsively check the app, leading to problematic use and mental harms.

Connect with an attorneyCheck Eligibility
A teen boy sitting on the floor, leaning back against a couch. He looks worried as he gazes at his cellphone

Case Overview

More than a thousand individuals are suing Snapchat and other social media companies for allegedly causing children to experience anxiety, low self-esteem, suicidal thoughts and other mental health issues. Plaintiffs allege the apps use features that are harmful for children. See if you’re eligible to file a mental health lawsuit against Snapchat.

04.02.2025

Important Snapchat lawsuit updates

  • June 2025: There were 1,814 lawsuits in the social media harm MDL.
  • March 2025: More than 60 families have sued Snapchat, alleging that the app has features that allow people to sell drugs to teens. The lawsuits may impact a key defense that social media companies have successfully used in previous cases.
  • March 2025: District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled that allegations such as wrongful death and negligence can proceed to trial.

Key takeaways about Snapchat lawsuits

  • A growing group of plaintiffs are suing Snapchat and other social media platforms.
  • The lawsuits allege that the defendants designed their platforms with features that put users’ mental and physical health at risk, particularly minors using the apps.
  • If you or your children have been harmed by social media use, you may have legal options to seek compensation.

Why are parents suing Snapchat?

Parents of children and teens are suing Snap, Inc., the parent company of Snapchat, for contributing to an ongoing mental health crisis. The litigation against Snap, Inc. is just one part of many lawsuits pending against social media platforms and their parent companies. 

Plaintiffs’ attorneys allege that Snapchat doesn’t: 

  • Have adequate parental controls
  • Implement safety features to protect children
  • Provide adequate warnings to families about the health risks of using Snapchat

By failing to address these issues, Snapchat puts young account holders at risk of mental health problems, online predators, drug use and other dangers associated with social media addiction.

The lawsuits claim that Snap, Inc., knew how its social media app could affect teens and children but took no action to protect them.

Multidistrict litigation consolidates Snapchat lawsuits 

Many parents have filed social media lawsuits against Snapchat on behalf of their children. It’s likely that more parents will file lawsuits in the near future. To handle the growing number of cases, the U.S. courts have organized them into a multidistrict litigation, a type of mass tort.

Class action lawsuits vs. multidistrict litigation (MDL)

The terms “class action” and “multidistrict litigation” are often incorrectly used interchangeably. 

  • Class action lawsuits are filed by individuals or small groups of individuals against the parties that allegedly wronged them. This person or small group is known as a “class.” The class represents the interests of a group of people with the same injuries. If the class action lawsuit is resolved in favor of the plaintiffs, the court will notify the “class” and distribute the funds or awards among them.
  • Multidistrict litigation (MDL) consolidates multiple cases with similar injuries and defendants into one court under one judge. This allows the court to handle cases more efficiently and establish common facts during the pretrial phase. If you file a lawsuit that’s consolidated into an MDL, you still have your individual case. It is not decided with someone else’s case. If you get a verdict, it's not split between multiple plaintiffs.

Eligibility

Who can file a social media harm lawsuit? Parents or guardians can file a lawsuit against social media companies on behalf of their minor children who suffered mental health harms such as suicidal ideation, eating disorders and depression requiring hospitalization. Young adults can also file a lawsuit if they were minors when their trauma was diagnosed or treated.

At this time, Motley Rice is not accepting cases regarding social media that deal with scams, stolen content or adult cases of problematic use.

As of June 2025, there were 1,814 cases pending in the MDL, known as In re: Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 3047. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers oversees the MDL in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

You might be eligible to file a Snapchat lawsuit:

  • You’re an adult (18 or older) who was harmed as a minor (17 or younger). As an adult, you can file suit on your own behalf.
  • You’re the parent or legal guardian of a minor whose mental health was harmed by using Snapchat. Potential harms include mental health problems, physical injury, drug use recovery, self-harm and death.

If you or a loved one has been harmed by social media use, first get the help you need. Once you’re ready to explore your legal options, a Snapchat lawyer at Motley Rice can provide a case evaluation.

Contact a Snap lawsuit attorney

Motley Rice is reviewing allegations that multiple social media platforms, including Instagram, TikTok, YouTube and Snapchat, are intentionally designed without regard for the safety of children.

Our thoughts go out to those affected by suicide, self-harm and eating disorders worsened by social media. 

Call Attorney Previn Warren at 1.800.768.4026 or complete this form to explore your options.

School districts file lawsuits against Snapchat

More than 1,000 school districts in the U.S. have filed suits against social media companies. They allege that Google, Snap, Inc., Meta, ByteDance and other tech companies have contributed to a student mental health crisis. This wave of lawsuits started when public schools in Seattle filed suit in 2023. Motley Rice now represents many school districts that have sued social media companies as part of the MDL.

Like the individual lawsuits, the school district lawsuits allege that social media companies made their products addictive to drive advertising revenue. The school districts claim this leads to poor outcomes, such as school property damage, bullying and exhausted students. Dealing with these issues exhausts school resources. 

The school district lawsuits focus on the impact to educators and the education system rather than the individual harms done to social media users who are minors. Districts might be eligible to file a claim if they've faced increased costs as a result of:

  • Investigating threats made on social media against schools or individuals
  • Providing additional counseling services to help students cope with social media-related mental health harms
  • Repairing damage from vandals or social media challenges
  • Spending extra time reworking lesson plans to accommodate shorter student attention spans
  • Training faculty and staff about how social media impacts students

These cases are mainly filed as public nuisance claims, alleging that taxpayer dollars and district resources have been expended on the social media crisis.

Government officials act to protect kids from social media harm

Government agencies have reacted to possible harm from Snapchat. Here are some important actions taken by government agencies and elected officials. These actions are not related to the federal MDL.

New Mexico sues Snapchat

The state of New Mexico filed a lawsuit against Snapchat in September 2024. Attorney General Raul Torrez alleged that the app’s policies and features don’t protect children from sexual exploitation. 

Torrez cited concerns about “sextortion.” In this situation, a Snapchat user coerces a minor to send them sexually explicit images and blackmails the victim with the content. 

Senators pass social media protection bills

In July 2024, the U.S. Senate passed a package of bills to force social media companies to enhance protections for young users and implement more effective parental controls. The Kids Online Safety Act and the Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act establish mandates that could:

  • Add privacy protection for account holders under 17
  • Allow parents to erase content as they see fit
  • Make social media companies take “reasonable measures” to protect children
  • Provide more effective parental controls
  • Prevent targeted advertising to children

State attorneys general call for social media protection

In 2022, 44 state attorneys general made a nonpartisan appeal to Snapchat to empower parents to protect their children. The letter expresses concerns about the “Discover” and “For You” sections on Snapchat. These features can allow adults to connect with minors on the platform, which adds to the risk of minors being groomed or exposed to illegal drugs.

What is Snapchat?

Snapchat is a social media app for Android and iOS mobile devices. It allows people to chat with each other with pictures or short videos called “snaps.” These messages are temporary and disappear soon after they’re posted or viewed. 

The temporary nature of snaps can lead users to compulsively check the app. This intentional design keeps users addicted, according to lawsuits against Snap, Inc.

Snapchat attracts a young user group: Gen Z is the largest demographic in the U.S. using the platform, with 48.6 million users. Gen Z uses Snapchat more than other social media platforms. 

Pie chart with separated pieces containing age ranges and percentages of Snapchat users, with text underneath explaining how the platform’s user base tends to be young.

Snapchat features that contribute to mental health issues

Snapchat’s features encourage compulsive use and reckless behavior by children, whose young brains crave social connection and approval. These features include:

  • Beauty filters: Snapchat’s filters allow users to create impossibly idealized versions of themselves These filters are highly associated with negative body image. So much so that the term “Snapchat dysmorphia” has been coined to describe the warped effect the app’s various filters have on young people. This dysmorphia has even led to an increase in requests for plastic surgeons to make users look like the filtered self they see on social media.
  • Disappearing messages: The primary use of the Snapchat app is to send photos and videos that are only viewable for short amounts of time. While this feature quickly made Snapchat known as “the sexting app,” even innocuous messages quickly disappear. As a result, many children constantly worry that they are missing out on what is happening on the app and compulsively check it. This effect is often called FOMO (fear of missing out).
  • Quick Add: A feature intended to recommend new friends, Quick Add makes friends suggestions based on mutual interests, friends, interests and location. Until 2022, Quick Add recommended that minors and adults follow each other on Snapchat. Plaintiffs’ attorneys allege that this allowed drug dealers to sell drugs to kids. An NBC investigation found that Snapchat was connected to sales of fentanyl-laced pills. These transactions led to the deaths of teens in young adults in several states.
  • Snap Map: With Snap Map, users can share their location. The feature provides a color-coded heat map. Snap Map is available to minors by default, though users can turn it off. It allows potential predators to know a child’s location and can make a user sad or anxious when comparing their location to where their friends are at any time.
  • Snap Stories: The plaintiffs’ allege the Snapchat feature is designed to trigger the release of dopamine. It shows a running view count and a list of who has viewed the user’s story. This also encourages users to make their Stories visible to increase their view count.
  • Snapstreak. Users achieve a Snapstreak, signified by a special icon on the app, when they snap each other within 24-hour periods for three or more days in a row. But if they miss even one day, the streak goes away. This gamification of friendship can create “feelings of pressure, anxiety and compulsion.”

How does Snapchat affect mental health?

Research shows that Snapchat’s features are associated with common social media harms such as:

Studies show that teens who spend more than three hours daily on social media apps are twice as likely to develop mental health issues. But some issues, such as danger from online predators, may not be related solely to the amount of time spent on social media apps. 

Consider these examples of how Snapchat can lead to mental health issues:

  • Striving for idealized images: Snapchat’s filters allow users to present an idealized version of themselves. This encourages damaging body image comparisons and can make children feel worse about their appearances.
  • Danger from online predators: Features such as disappearing messages and Quick Add can help online predators and drug dealers connect with minor account holders. Connecting minor and adult users can lead to grooming and other forms of sexual abuse, which can lead to long-lasting trauma. Likewise, drug use can lead to mental and physical harm for children.
  • Chasing dopamine: Disappearing messages, Snapstreaks and push notifications induce users’ brains to produce dopamine. This compels account holders – especially children – to use the app frequently. This preys on their fear of missing out (FOMO), which can lead to mental health problems.
  • Negative social comparison: Snapchat’s filters and Snap Stories lead to users comparing their appearances, surroundings and other circumstances to each other. This can lead to sadness and loneliness if users feel that other people's lives are better. 

Learn more about whether Snapchat is safe for kids.

Snapchat lawsuit timeline

06.03.25

MDL numbers grew leading into June

As of June 2, the social media harm MDL grew to 1,814 pending actions.

05.02.25

May report shows increase in MDL numbers

The social media harm MDL has increased to 1,787 pending actions.

04.02.25

MDL numbers grew leading into April

Nearly 300 people have joined the social media MDL since the beginning of March. The new cases brought the total of pending actions to 1,745.

03.31.25

Texas school districts continue to join MDL

The Corpus Christi Independent School District in Texas joined the social media MDL. The district’s attorney claims that 46 Texas school districts have joined the MDL. The district currently doesn’t allow students from kindergarten through eighth grade to use smartwatches and cellphones during the school day. High school students can use cellphones only during their lunch period and between classes.

03.20.25

Author of the Meta memoir can testify in MDL

U.S. Magistrate Judge Peter H. Kang ruled that the author of a memoir that criticized Meta Platforms can testify in the MDL. Sarah Wynn-Williams worked at Meta from 2011 to 2017 as the director of public policy. Meta Platforms argued that her information wasn’t relevant to personal injury. They also argued that the plaintiffs took too much time to get her testimony. 
 

03.12.25

MDL judge rules against interlocutory appeal

Judge Gonzalez Rogers ruled that social media apps and sites are a legal nuisance. She wrote that her ruling would maintain coordination among plaintiffs from different states. She further said that the MDL would “quickly splinter and fragment” if she granted the defendants’ request for interlocutory appeal.

03.03.25

New lawsuits could impact Section 230 defense

A lawsuit filed by more than 60 families described Snapchat as a “digital open-air drug market” and claimed the app’s features expose children to drug dealers. While the suit is aimed at Snapchat, it could affect the defenses of other platforms that were built on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Section 230 protects social media companies from being held liable for user-generated content.

03.03.25

Judge rules to allow non-priority claims

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued a ruling to allow “non-priority” claims against social media companies to proceed in the MDL. These claims allege general negligence, loss of consortium, survival and wrongful death. The judge dismissed separate claims related to child sex abuse material (CSAM), saying that “plaintiffs do not argue that they allege Meta and Snap enhanced the development or distribution of third-party CSAM.” 
 

03.03.25

March MDL numbers increased

The social media MDL grew to 1,464 pending actions.

02.13.25

Largest school district in Texas joined MDL against social media companies

The Houston Independent School District board voted unanimously to join the multidistrict litigation consisting of mental health lawsuits against Snapchat and other social media companies. The lawsuits allege that social media platforms have reduced students’ attention spans and harmed their mental health. The district seeks compensation for the educational impact.
 

 

02.06.25

San Diego County sued Snapchat and other social media companies

San Diego County filed a lawsuit against Snapchat, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and YouTube, alleging that their platforms put a higher premium on making money than on users’ health. County officials hoped to pressure social media companies to address dangerous features of their platforms. The county also hoped to force social media companies to fund more mental health resources. 
 

02.04.25

MDL reached more than 1,200 cases filed

These cases are about problematic use of Snapchat and other social media platforms and the impact each platform has on the mental health of children and adolescents.

01.27.25

Del Norte County joined other California counties in social media lawsuit

Del Norte County joined two other California counties in suing social media companies. County counsel Jacqueline Roberts alleged that Snap, TikTok, Meta and Google have reaped financial benefits by deliberately designing platforms that cater to the OCD tendencies of minors. The county has retained outside counsel to help with the lawsuit. 
 

01.27.25

Milwaukee Public Schools joined social media lawsuits

The largest school district in Wisconsin joined a lawsuit against social media companies. Milwaukee Public Schools allege that Snapchat, Meta Platforms, YouTube and TikTok have all contributed to a youth mental health crisis that impacts their students. 
 

01.08.25

Consolidation in California

Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Carolyn B. Kuhl ruled that Meta, YouTube, Snap (Snapchat) and TikTok cannot cut failure-to-warn claims from consolidated litigation in California Superior Court. These lawsuits can move forward in the consolidated California docket, which is separate from the federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) overseen by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.

01.08.25

Social media companies face lawsuit from Apache tribe in Arizona

The White Mountain Apache Tribe filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against several social media companies, including Snap. The tribe claims that social media companies contribute to mental health crises among its youth. The lawsuit’s allegations fall under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO. 

12.01.24

New cases added to the social media MDL

The number of plaintiffs in MDL No. 3047 increased to 815.

11.08.24

Judge dismisses Meta CEO from personal liability claims

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled against claims that Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, is personally liable in lawsuits alleging that social media companies deliberately made children and adolescents addicted to social media. The judge didn’t find enough evidence to establish Zuckerberg’s personal liability. 

11.01.24

More lawsuits are filed

The social media multidistrict litigation (MDL) grew to 620 pending actions, including the Snapchat lawsuits. This is up from 455 pending actions in May 2024.

10.24.25

School district lawsuits to proceed in social media harm MDL

District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled that many school district lawsuits against Meta (Instagram and Facebook), ByteDance (TikTok), Alphabet (YouTube) and Snap (Snapchat) can move forward. Her ruling included some limitations, but may still encourage more individual plaintiffs to file mental health lawsuits and school districts to file claims against these tech companies.

09.09.24

New Mexico AG sued Snapchat

Raul Torrez, the Attorney General for New Mexico, filed suit against Snapchat. He alleged that the platform’s features and policies don’t adequately protect children from sexual exploitation.

08.01.24

New plaintiffs continued to join MDL

As of August 2024, 557 actions were pending in the social media harm MDL, which includes cases against Snapchat. New cases are filed each week.

07.02.24

Senate passed legislation to address social media harm

The U.S. Senate passed the Kids Online Safety Act and the Children and Teens’ Online Privacy Protection Act. If it passes the U. S. House of Representatives, both bills will require social media platforms to take reasonable measures to provide more parental control over their children’s social media use and prevent social media-related harm to teens and children.

05.05.23

Experts questioned new Snapchat feature

Snapchat provided free access for all users to My AI, which some teen users use for mental health advice. Some experts question whether interacting with a chatbot in this situation can make teens feel even more disconnected.

02.01.23

Plaintiffs filed master complaint

Plaintiffs filed a master complaint in the Northern District of California. It names social media companies such as Meta, Snap, ByteDance and Google as defendants.

11.02.22

MDL judge approved plaintiffs' leadership team

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers approved a leadership team for MDL No. 3047, the consolidated cases against social media companies for creating defective products that cause harm to users. The team includes Motley Rice attorney Previn Warren as co-lead counsel.

10.01.22

Social media cases consolidated into MDL

Lawsuits against TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat and other social media platforms are consolidated into an MDL docket. 

03.01.22

State AGs urged social media companies to improve parental controls

Forty-four state attorneys general wrote to social media legal counsel to express concern about the lack of parental controls on popular platforms. 

07.01.20

Parents called for Snapchat to safeguard against child pornography

More than 100,000 parents signed a Parents United petition to encourage Snapchat to begin scanning content for child pornography.

11.01.19

Senators demanded answers about online sexual grooming

A bipartisan group of U.S. senators sent a letter asking about online sexual grooming for children who use social media apps. 

View Full Timeline

Frequently asked questions about Snapchat legal cases

Is there a mental health lawsuit against Snapchat?

Yes, individuals are suing Snap, Inc. and other social media companies. They allege that social media companies built features into their platforms, knowing they were a risk to users’ mental health. 

As of June 2025, there were 1,814 lawsuits, and that number is expected to grow. To ease the strain on the court system and allow plaintiffs to share resources, these cases were organized into a multidistrict litigation (MDL) docket. 

Who is filing Snapchat mental health lawsuits?

Snapchat and parent company, Snap Inc., are facing a number of lawsuits in a multidistrict litigation (MDL) related to the app’s addictive design and the alleged harm it causes children. The parties filing these individual lawsuits include:

  • Parents of children who have been harmed by Snapchat
  • Adults who were harmed as children by Snapchat
  • School districts and other government agencies that allege they have suffered costs and damages as a result of Snapchat

What damages may be available in a Snapchat mental health lawsuit?

If your attorney wins a jury trial or negotiates a settlement, you may receive compensation for:

  • Emotional distress
  • Expenses for physical or mental treatment
  • Loss of income
  • Physical pain and suffering

No cases in the Snapchat mental lawsuits have gone to trial or settled, so it’s not possible to estimate an average payout. The damages you might receive would depend on your individual circumstances. 

A Motley Rice Snapchat attorney can explore your options.

Are people suing Snapchat for reasons other than mental health harm? 

Yes, Snap, Inc. faces legal actions that are not related to mental health. They include:

  • New Mexico is suing Snap, Inc. for allegedly failing to protect children from potential sexual exploitation. The state attorney general filed the suit in September 2024, raising concerns about predators using sexually explicit images to extort more content or money from victims.
  • Nevill et al v. Snap, Inc., which alleges that Snapchat features allowed children to buy drugs through the app.
  • A discrimination lawsuit that Snapchat recently offered to settle for $15 million. The class-action suit alleged that the company discriminated against female employees. The settlement requires court approval.
  • A high school student who claims Snapchat allowed his science teacher to lure him into a sexual relationship. The teacher pleaded guilty to sexual assault in 2022. The student’s attorneys are asking the Supreme Court to reconsider a law that shields social media companies from responsibility for user-generated content.
  • A class action lawsuit alleging that Snap violated state privacy law. Plaintiffs accused Snap of collecting biometric data in violation of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act. Snap settled the class-action lawsuit without going to trial.

Have any Snapchat class action lawsuits been filed?

Yes, but it wasn't related to mental health or social media addiction. In May 2022, a class action lawsuit against Snap Inc. (Boone, et al. v. Snap Inc.) was filed in Illinois. The lawsuit alleged that Snapchat collected facial recognition data with its filters and lenses, but didn’t tell users about the collection or get permission first. Snap agreed to a settlement, so the class action lawsuit did not go to trial.

Our Snapchat litigation experience

Motley Rice attorneys have worked for decades to help families and individuals stand up to multinational tech companies. Our experience includes representing people harmed by technology and social media companies, such as Snap Inc. Our firm can help if you or your child have:

  • Attempted or died by suicide
  • Been diagnosed by a healthcare professional for a mental health disorder
  • Treated for self-harm

If you believe these conditions were caused or worsened by social media, our firm can help you file a lawsuit for social media harm. Your well-being is important to our team.

Read more about our social media litigation experience.

Help for self-harm and suicidal behavior

If you or a loved one are in crisis, national resources can help immediately.

  • You can reach the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 988. This free and confidential call will connect you with a trained staff member. You can also visit their website: 988lifeline.org.
  • You can contact the National Eating Disorder Association (NEDA) toll-free number at 1-800-931-2237. The association’s website can also direct you to resources at NationalEatingDisorders.org. 

Why are parents suing Snapchat?

School districts file lawsuits against Snapchat

Government officials act to protect kids from social media harm

What is Snapchat?

How does Snapchat affect mental health?

Snapchat lawsuit timeline

Frequently asked questions about Snapchat legal cases

Our Snapchat litigation experience

About the Author

Sources
  1. ABC News. Families' lawsuit against Snapchat alleging the platform enables drug dealers allowed to move forward.
  2. ABC News. Senate overwhelmingly passes package of bills aimed at protecting kids and teens online.
  3. American Enterprise Institute. Demystifying Social Media Addiction Litigation.
  4. Associated Press. Details from New Mexico’s lawsuit against Snap show site failed to act on reports of sextortion.
  5. AZ Central. White Mountain Apache sues social media platforms, citing mental health risks.
  6. Bloomberg Law. Tech Giants Denied Prompt Appeal in Schools' Addiction Suit.
  7. Business Standard. 'Mental health crisis': Meta, Google & TikTok to face addiction claims.
  8. CBS 8. County files lawsuit against 5 major social media platforms to improve youth mental health crisis.
  9. Corpus Christi Caller Times. Social media addiction: CCISD wants to join lawsuit against Instagram, TikTok, others.
  10. Education Week. School District Lawsuits Against Social Media Companies Are Piling Up.
  11. Emarketer. Guide to Snapchat: Audience stats, ad opportunities, and trends for marketers.
  12. Fox News. Illinois Snapchat users reportedly begin receiving settlement money from lawsuit.
  13. Fox News. Teens are turning to Snapchat's 'My AI' for mental health support — which doctors warn against.
  14. Local 12. Parents push for social media companies to screen videos for child pornography.
  15. Houston Landing. Houston ISD to join lawsuit against social media companies over student mental health.
  16. Houston Public Media. Houston ISD joining nationwide group of school districts in suing social media companies.
  17. Law 360. 'Careless People' Author Can Testify In Meta Addiction MDL.
  18. Law.com. With Final Dismissal Order, Social Media Addiction Claims Head Toward Trial.
  19. Los Angeles Times. Parents are blaming Snapchat for their teens’ fentanyl deaths. Will an L.A. lawsuit shape the future of social media?
  20. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Milwaukee Public Schools to sue social media companies over youth mental health crisis.
  21. National Association of Attorneys General. Letter to TikTok and Snapchat Legal Counsel.
  22. NBC. Snapchat makes it harder for kids to buy drugs.
  23. PCMag. School Districts Notch a Win in Tech Addiction Case Against Top Platforms.
  24. Politico. Bill banning social media for youngsters advances.
  25. Ramphui, K. and Mejias, S. Is "Snapchat Dysmorphia" a Real Issue? Cureus. 2018 March 3; 10(3): e2263.
  26. Redwood Voice. Del Norte Joins Public Nuisance Lawsuit Against Social Media Giants.
  27. Reuters. Abused teen in Snap case asks US Supreme Court to revisit internet publisher immunity.
  28. Reuters. Instagram, TikTok teen addiction lawsuits grouped in northern California.
  29. Reuters. Meta’s Zuckerberg not liable in lawsuits over social media harm to children.
  30. Reuters. Snap sued by New Mexico over failure to protect children from sexual exploitation.
  31. The Recorder. With Final Dismissal Order, Social Media Addiction Claims Head Toward Trial.
  32. Verus. Judge Approves MDL 3047 Leadership Team for Social Media Addiction Litigation.
  33. U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Pending MDLs.
  34. U.S. News & World Report. Snapchat Inc. to Pay $15 Million to Settle Discrimination and Harassment Lawsuit in California.
Your Legal Options

Start Your Motley Rice Consultation in Simple Steps

Connect with an Attorney1.800.768.4026

1

Submit Information

Call us or fill out our online form with the details of your potential case.

2

Case Review

Our team reviews your information to assess your potential case.

3

Case Consultation

Talk with us about next steps.